Audiophily and audiofoolery notes: Difference between revisions

From Helpful
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
{{#addbodyclass:tag_opinion}}
{{#addbodyclass:tag_opinion}}


<!--
{{avnotes}}
{{avnotes}}
-->
=Disclaimer=
<!--
There are many audiophiles that have preferences ''regardless'' over whether there is truth to it.
I'm not here to frustrate over them. See [[Brandolini's law]].
And the audiophiles are happy ''regardless'' of reality, because that's how [[confirmation bias]] works. 
I am even a little envious of that.
When it comes to audiophily, there are a lot of claims that are pure nonsense.
But a lot more of it is ''based'' in something real, but on a gliding scale of misunderstood and/or exagerrated so most of them them
that the actual statement is nonsense.
Or it's real but has completely negligible effect
Or it's real but improving it is contingent on rebuilding your house.
Or it's real but it requires sitting unmovably in the perfect spot.
Or it's real but it's such diminishing returns that the first 50 bucks makes more difference than the next 10000.
: Because sure, the ''cheapest'' devices are only there to make a sound at all -- the cheapest of ''anything'' is generally not good -- but we've had decades to do refine "doing the thing halfway decently" so that it isn't that much more expensive anymore.
Diminishing returns means
: Do things still get better? A little.
: Do things get more expensive? A lot.
Or it's real but it's not the largest issue your setup currently has.
This seems most valuable to me: figure out what the weakest link is.
Most of us just guess, because a lot of things are hard to measure ''or'' reason out.
But I'm gonna try.
Because maybe it turns out the reverb in your room has more effect than most technical details and a piece of cloth fixes that.
Or maybe not.
I'd like to know.
Because I don't mind a decent audio system -- it's just not my identity, or my moneypit hobby, and also I don't have the disposable income.
People will differ in how much disposable income you want to throw at the diminishing returns.
''I'm'' not, but if you're doing to do that, wouldn't you like to know what the money is best thrown at?
Any salesperson out to sell you the thing with the bigger number is not going to think like that, so we're on our own here.
As far as I can tell,
: there are a handful of things you can get for ''free'' just by knowing them,
: after which ''can'' usefully spend a few hundred bucks before the largest issue becomes your room,
: and ''maybe'' a few thousand before it's your head (positioning and such),
: and then ''in'' your head (believing nonsense marketing, or inventing your own).
Beyond ''that'' point madness lies.
And ''well'' before that, you will find the slippiest technobabble since star trek TOS,
except in utter earnesty, about real-world physics that is entirely verifiable.
'''Point is: this is only here to convince myself, not anyone else.'''
And it is ''definitely'' in an opinionated according-to-''me'' page,
and the list is too long to do thorough research on everything.
'''Not everything is valued properly'''
In my research I found a plethora of poop out there,
so I am biased to be very critical stance by default - and to be fair, sometimes more than merited.
The true stuff will often take longer to get to me,
and some ratings may rise over time as I understand the subtleties
people are not very good at explaining.
-->

Latest revision as of 12:30, 27 April 2024


Disclaimer