Softmax: Difference between revisions

From Helpful
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{stub}}
{{stub}}


<!--
'''softmax''' (sometimes called softargmax, normalized exponential function, and other things )
softmax (a.k.a. softargmax, normalized exponential function)
 
* takes a vector of numbers
* takes a vector of numbers


* provides a vector of probabilities  
* returns a vector of probabilities  
:: all in 0 .. 1
:: all in 0 .. 1
:: that sum to 1.0
:: that sum to 1.0




Many references you will find ''now'' are its use in neural nets,
where they take activation on any sort, and put them into 0..1 scale sensibly,
as a normalization step that is often used at least in the final layer, and sometimes at the end of smaller building blocks as well.


Note that it is ''not'' just normalization.


When using nets as multiclass classifiers, you would need ''something'' like softmax to be able to respond on all the labels,
Nor is it only a way to bring out the strongest answer.
and in a way that looks like probabilities. 
In part it's just a choice of what you want to show (you could output classification margin scores instead),
in part it's a choice that
 
 
Note that it is ''not'' just normalization.  


Nor is just a way to bring out the strongest answer.
The exponent in its internals, plus the "will sum to 1.0 part" will mean things shift around in a non-linear way,
Both its exponent internals and the "will sum to 1.0 part" will mean things shift around in a non-linear way,
so even relative probabilities already in in 0..1 and summing to 1.0 will change, e.g.  
so even relative probabilities already in in 0..1 and summing to 1.0 will change, e.g.  
: softmax([1.0,0.5,0.1])  ~= 0.5, 0.3, 0.2,  
: softmax([1.0,0.5,0.1])  ~= 0.5, 0.3, 0.2,  
: softmax([0.5, 0.3, 0.2]) ~= 0.4, 0.31, 0.28
: softmax([0.5, 0.3, 0.2]) ~= 0.4, 0.31, 0.28


<!--
If you squint, it is ''something'' like [[sigmoid]] function,
but it is not directly comparable to transfer functions,
and you can't get an easy plot of it,
exactly ''because'' it takes multiple inputs.




While the exponent makes it look like some choices of sigmoid functions,
It is a more generic mathematical tool,  
historically seen a bunch in machine learning,
and these days many references are its use in neural nets.


And it isn't directly comparable to transfer functions, and you can't get an easy graph of it, exactly ''because'' it takes multiple inputs.
In that context they will
take activation on any sort,  
and put them into 0..1 scale sensibly,
mostly as a normalization step that is often used at least in the final layer,
and sometimes at the end of smaller building blocks as well.




But also, it's a more general mathematical tool, even if it's mostly seen in machine learning.
When using nets as multiclass classifiers, you would need ''something'' like softmax to be able to respond on all the labels,
and in a way that looks like probabilities. 
In part it's just a choice of what you want to show (you could output classification margin scores instead),  
in part it's a choice that
 




Line 48: Line 53:


-->
-->
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Softmax_function

Revision as of 14:48, 13 February 2024

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

softmax (sometimes called softargmax, normalized exponential function, and other things )

  • takes a vector of numbers
  • returns a vector of probabilities
all in 0 .. 1
that sum to 1.0


Note that it is not just normalization.

Nor is it only a way to bring out the strongest answer.

The exponent in its internals, plus the "will sum to 1.0 part" will mean things shift around in a non-linear way, so even relative probabilities already in in 0..1 and summing to 1.0 will change, e.g.

softmax([1.0,0.5,0.1]) ~= 0.5, 0.3, 0.2,
softmax([0.5, 0.3, 0.2]) ~= 0.4, 0.31, 0.28



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Softmax_function