Video wall notes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
You need some processing to split up the video signal into multiple. | |||
''' | You might hope that '''analog''' video signals lend themselves more to being split into multiple portions, | ||
but it doesn't - it takes almost as much decode, handing as video, and repackaging with the right timing. | |||
Which is why this is typically done via a device doing it for you. | |||
Which, being niche devices, are not very cheap. | Which, being niche devices, are not very cheap. | ||
For '''digital''' video much the same argument goes - if what you have is a video signal. | For '''digital''' video much the same argument goes - if what you have is a single video signal. | ||
The largest leftover issue is finding a setup with enough outputs. | If your source is a PC, that PC's ability to deal with multiple monitors (which has been around for a ''long'' while now) will do all the splitting up at the video card stage. | ||
The largest leftover issue ''then'' is finding a setup with enough outputs. | |||
Since video cards tend to stop at 4 or 8 outputs, | Since video cards tend to stop at 4 or 8 outputs, | ||
this may require multiple video cards - and then the coordination between them. | this may require multiple video cards - and then the coordination between them. | ||
In some cases, you might use a spare PC ''as'' a video splitter, | |||
though | |||
capture cards do not come cheap enough for this to make much difference with a dedicated splitter | |||
and there is likely more processing latency involved. | |||
--> | --> |
Latest revision as of 10:25, 26 April 2024
✎ This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.