RAM disk

The lower-level parts of computers

General: Computer power consumption · Computer noises

Memory: Some understanding of memory hardware · CPU cache · Flash memory · Virtual memory · Memory mapped IO and files · RAM disk · Memory limits on 32-bit and 64-bit machines

Unsorted: Interrupts · Computer booting · GPU, GPGPU, OpenCL, CUDA notes

A RAM disk refers to, well, using RAM as a disk.

This is often

presented by a program in an already-running system,
asking for some memory from the OS, and
somehow making it look like disk storage to others,

often with a regular POSIX/windows-style filesystem interface.

The idea is often that

operations towards this will be much faster than going to permanent storage

at the rist of losing everything in there if your computer crashes

This was more interesting around platter storage, where the difference in speed was noticeable, particularly if there were multiple readers/writers -- primarily because of the disk seek latency.

In platter, the largest differences is speed, because RAM is much faster latency than platter disk

On SSD, the speedup is milder,

so you may consider using SSD, and also getting persistent storage
the main reason to still do it is probably to try to lessen wear of that flash, especially if you often deal with huge amounts of temporary data

Note that, because OSes will generally consider all RAM fair game to swap to disk, and because that would defeat the purpose of the speedup, RAM disks may make a point of marking this memory as non-swappable.

...which, depending on further details, may easily amount to reserving and then never using physical memory, so will decrease the amount of freely usable RAM and increase the likeliness of the system's memory pressure.

tl;dr: you may make other things worse, which can be dumb if you then don't use it.

Linux

tmpfs and ramfs; shm and /run

If you want to ruse RAM as a disk, the immediate options in linux are:

ramfs is actually very thin wrapper exposing the RAM cacheing system as usable space.

tmpfs, based on ramfs, adds a size limit and swappability

(so acts much more like the classical "allocates a fixed block of RAM" style ram disk)

The main differences:

size:

neither consumes RAM until you store something

ramfs will grow as far as it can, when asked

tmpfs will report an error when it hits its limit (will act like a full disk) - so is safer for system stability

df:

ramfs adds to the 'cached' figure in free/top

tmpfs shows as a drive in e.g. df

swap:

ramfs is not eligible for swap

tmpfs is eligible for swap - safer, but can defeat the point somewhat

While ramfs is the sometimes-lower-latency option int that there can be no swapping via possibly-slow IO, it also means it is up to every app that uses it to to behave; "will not swap" combined with " can always grow" means you can very efficiently run yourself out of free RAM, cause trashing and system instability.

Uses

Linuxes keep various transient runtime information in ram disks, largely because there's no point contending for for disk for something you won't ever care to keep.

This includes /var/lock (locks), /var/run (runtime state), /dev/shm (modest data passing), and others that can be distro-specific.

This is usually backed by tmpfs.

Some distros decided to migrate (for now symlink) this stuff to /run so a single mount covers them all - see e.g. [1]

zram

In the linux kernel since 3.2(verify)

zram (previously compcache) provides block devices that are backed by memory and transparently compressed (lzo, lz4, more?).

Uses up to a predefined uncompressed maximum size.

(TODO: figure out whether it's eligible for swap)

This can make sense for

scratch space

certain caches, e.g. ZFS L2ARC on zram can make sense

backing compressed swap, effectively increasing the amount of available RAM when things are swapped out, without using disk to do it

...but these days you probably want to use zswap for that

zswap

Provides swap pages from RAM, rather than from a block device.

Effectively an layer between RAM and disk swap: if the zswap pool is full, or RAM is exhausted, zswap moves pages to disk swap in an LRU style.

Difference between zswap and zram-which-you-happen-to-use-to-back-swapspace

zram-for-swap is a few more commands

zram-used-for-swap is separate from existing swap

so zswap is cleverer when there is disk swap

and zram often works better when there won't be other swap configured

initrd, initramfs

This is a specific use - a bootstrapping thing: the purpose of linux's initramfs (previously initrd) is to mount the root filesystem.

initramfs

rescueInitramfs

cramfs, squashfs

(squashfs has replaced cramfs)

Read-only filesystem with low overhead, most useful for embedded devices, thin clients, system partitions on phones, liveCD/liveUSB.

In some cases the read-only nature is part of the design and means an embedded device can't easily brick itself, in other cases (e.g. liveUSB) it's mainly to save a little space.