Normative: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
In a wider sense, a '''norm''' tends to mean some standard for evaluating or making judgments about behavior or outcomes. | |||
There is an occasionally-useful distinction between | |||
* '''evaluative standards''' - we should do what seems to be good, for ''the reason'' that its effect seems to be good | |||
* '''descriptive standards''', which are more the "do what is standard/typically done" sort | |||
: which is sometimes even fairly ''prescriptive'' | |||
{{comment|(Confusingly, both can be called 'normative', because both are still about judging what you should do)}} | |||
{{comment|(Confusingly, both can be called 'normative', because | |||
---- | |||
Line 20: | Line 22: | ||
In philosophy and law, normativity mostly refers to what society collectively considers good, desirable, or permissible. | |||
In philosophy, mostly ethics, [[normative ethics]] is about telling us the things that ''should'' or ''shouldnt'' be done be done. | |||
In linguistics (and e.g. law), | |||
'''normative language''' refers to text that endorses a certain course of action. | |||
For example, "I think you should keep your promise" is a normative expression in the above sense. | |||
(in a more mechanical sense, formulation using 'should', 'will', etc. tend to be pretty normative) | |||
In linguistics, normativity is often encoded via phrasing that we | In linguistics, normativity isn't just a topic being discussed, but is often also encoded via phrasing that we might call its own [[modality]] (making it a little more than a topic or stylistic choice). | ||
{{comment|(For context, [[modality]] roughly means 'is about permissibility, desirability, likeliness, and/or truthfulness' - and a little more concretely, examples of modalities include ''deontic modality'' meaning you want a certain action, ''epistemic modality'' expresses what is argued to probably be true, ''intrinsic modality''' and '''disposition modality'' are more about what options there are)}} | |||
For example, laws (and to a lesser degree jurisprudence) contain ample normative language, because a good part concerns itself with expressing [[normative ethics]] (what should or shouldn't be done) - or what that turns into when you apply that in everyday life. | |||
Legal texts are typically largely normative, and are potentially interesting to language research | Legal texts are typically largely normative, and are potentially interesting to language research | ||
in that they are also relatively precise at expressing | in that they are also relatively precise at expressing | ||
--> | --> |
Revision as of 14:45, 20 September 2023
✎ This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.
See also: