Contextualism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* For example to point out that the meaning of some actions may only be understood in that context, and not ''just'' from also being another person that exists. | * For example to point out that the meaning of some actions may only be understood in that context, and not ''just'' from also being another person that exists. | ||
* | * Somewhat more controversially, that how ''correct'' a choice or outcome is may be similarly contextual - which gets into [[ethical relativism]], or at least [[situational ethics]]. | ||
Revision as of 12:56, 27 February 2024
✎ This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.
In philosophy, contextualism mostly just emphasizes that actions and utterance happen inside a particular context.
- For example to point out that the meaning of some actions may only be understood in that context, and not just from also being another person that exists.
- Somewhat more controversially, that how correct a choice or outcome is may be similarly contextual - which gets into ethical relativism, or at least situational ethics.
In linguistics, it seems contextualism might signal
- awareness that utterances are from a discourse, and interpretation draws from the whole
- a formalized semantic system of interpretation - sometimes just "we are restricting ourselves to a domain", sometimes because that makes a particular task less messy.