Contextualism: Difference between revisions

From Helpful
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
* For example to point out that the meaning of some actions may only be understood in that context, and not ''just'' from also being another person that exists.
* For example to point out that the meaning of some actions may only be understood in that context, and not ''just'' from also being another person that exists.


* And, somewhat more controversially, that how ''correct'' a choice or outcome is may be similarly contextual - which gets into [[ethical relativism]], or at least [[situational ethics]].
* Somewhat more controversially, that how ''correct'' a choice or outcome is may be similarly contextual - which gets into [[ethical relativism]], or at least [[situational ethics]].





Revision as of 12:56, 27 February 2024

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.


In philosophy, contextualism mostly just emphasizes that actions and utterance happen inside a particular context.

  • For example to point out that the meaning of some actions may only be understood in that context, and not just from also being another person that exists.



In linguistics, it seems contextualism might signal

awareness that utterances are from a discourse, and interpretation draws from the whole
a formalized semantic system of interpretation - sometimes just "we are restricting ourselves to a domain", sometimes because that makes a particular task less messy.