Cooling things: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Sometimes includes adding a fan, to add to the convection. | Sometimes includes adding a fan, to add to the convection. | ||
You're stirring the air better than just convection would, so heat transfer goes a | You're stirring the air better than just convection would, so heat transfer goes a faster than if warm air just sits around - but the difference is rarely much -- convection always does this at least a little when there is temperature difference (if you're in gravity; this is about density differences). | ||
And you could argue that's ''technically'' active cooling (because you're adding work, so using energy), | And you could argue that's ''technically'' active cooling (because you're adding work, so using energy), | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
(If you have a datacenter in the arctic, you might actually get a lot from just having a fan outside | (If you have a datacenter in the arctic, you might actually get a lot from just having a fan outside -- if you didn't care about moisture anyway; you'd actually use a heat exchanger but this could be passive beyond the pumps | ||
In most places, passive cooling doesn't move a lot of heat, though) | |||
--> | |||
| Line 186: | Line 189: | ||
It turns out | It turns out to not make a lot of difference ''why'' evaporation happens - it will take away heat regardless. | ||
So when evaporation happens without adding heat, it cools somewhat. | |||
{{comment|(If you want a technical term, you could call it the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_heat latent cooling] of vaporization)}} | |||
| Line 700: | Line 704: | ||
==Free cooling== | ==Free cooling== | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
Free cooling means "use the fact that it is cold outside to cool inside". | |||
For example, in cold climates, you can cool industrial processes or datacenters just by ''moving'' water or air around. | |||
If temperature difference are seasonal, | Yes, you could open the window, but more controlled in terms of humidity but also the actual temperature, | ||
so this often amounts to heat exchangers to cool an otherwise closed system. | |||
If temperature difference are seasonal, you may prefer heat pumps - putting in a little more energy | |||
for a lot more over-the-year guarantees, so just mean part of the system becomes more efficient in some seasons. | |||
This is no longer ''free'' cooling, but still ery useful. | |||
If there is a significant day-night differences in temperature, | If there is a significant day-night differences in temperature, | ||
it may make sense to have reasonably-sided buffers. | it may make sense to have reasonably-sided buffers. | ||
| Line 1,233: | Line 1,247: | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
As in, a little 12V device rated at a few watts, to at most a few dozen watts. | As in, a little 12V device rated at a few watts, to ''at most'' a few dozen watts. | ||
They can eventually pull moisture out of a sealed-enough room. | |||
These are often basically a [[peltier element]] with two heat sinks: | |||
: one large one on the warm side, to drive off heat (just to keep the peltier working), | |||
: one small one to drip condensated water from. | |||
So they will gently heat the air while dehumidifying, but that is an even subtler by-effect | |||
because that will happen at a little less than the watt rating it has. | |||
There are somewhat chunkier mains-powered variants, | |||
which are effectively small ACs | |||
''without'' managing the airflow that would cool one room at the cost of the temperature of another, as normal ACs do. | |||
In fact, they will intentally flow air slowly. | |||
--> | --> | ||
| Line 1,403: | Line 1,425: | ||
In various countries, ACs are designed that way. | In various countries, ACs are designed that way. | ||
And yes, | |||
And yes, this setup is more efficient than a basic resisive heater. | |||
But not as efficient as a variation of this that is ''designed'' to do this. | |||
When they are not, you could still mount them in reverse, but it's not going to be nearly as efficient | When they are not, you could still mount them in reverse, but | ||
* it's not going to be nearly as efficient (if its CoP is still >1 like this, then it is still better than your basic resistive heater). | |||
* there may be reasons it will not work like that, or isn't the safest thing to do. | |||
For various reasons. | For various reasons. | ||
Latest revision as of 15:55, 31 January 2024
Physical mechanics of cooling
Passive cooling
Passive cooling tends to mean 'what happens with no moving parts'.
...so whatever amount of conduction, radiation, and/or convection would happen anyway.
Sometimes includes adding a fan, to add to the convection.
You're stirring the air better than just convection would, so heat transfer goes a faster than if warm air just sits around - but the difference is rarely much -- convection always does this at least a little when there is temperature difference (if you're in gravity; this is about density differences).
And you could argue that's technically active cooling (because you're adding work, so using energy), but intuitively it feels like it hardly qualifies.
On the technical side
This tends to mean
- conduction - a good conductor spreading heat throughout
- if any cooling happens, conduction's spreading brings the whole down
- radiation - thermal radiation means movement of charges in materials (anything above 0 K) is radiated as EM at the surface
- (black-body radiation can be seen as a "thermal radiation's real-world math becomes easier if we make some assumptions like that it's not really interacting in other ways")
- convection - fluid flow, in this context often
- air,
- flow caused by heat changing temperatures and densities
- that flow assisting better heat interchange with that fluid, because warmer air moving up tends to draws in colder air from the sides (which technically is an effect that needs gravity)
In practice there's more than one of these happening, but often one that counts for most exchange.