Interpretation: Difference between revisions

From Helpful
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{#addbodyclass:tag_ling}}
{{stub}}
{{stub}}


<!--
<!--
The meaning of a sentence is rarely obvious.
The meaning of a sentence is rarely obvious.
[[Compositionality]] is interesting and a good start, but sentences are often not a simple composition
of the meanings of its constituents (even just phrases have this problem already), 
which makes the process of understanding natural language a lot more interesting and complex,
and the field and angle of semantics quite necessary.


[[Compositionality]] argues it starts with the combination of the meanings of its constituents,
and it's a good start,
but most sentences in most languages go beyond that, in fact even a lot of phrases already fall outside that.
This makes the process of understanding natural language a lot more interesting and complex,
almost necesarily involving a somewhat creative intention to resolve, and the field and angle of semantics quite necessary.
For example, polysemy means a word may have different meanings, so even if the use of this signifier is unambiguous,
word sense disambiguation is still required to know what is signified, to map lexical units to meaning.


For example, polysemy means a word may have different meanings, so word sense disambiguation is required, to map lexical units to meaning. This is subject to various kinds of contextual forces. It is also regularly made more complex by things like [[metaphor]]ic use, [[metonym]]s, various [[figures of speech]], and other non-literal meanings.
This is subject to various kinds of contextual forces. It is also regularly made more complex by things like [[metaphor]]ic use, [[metonym]]s, various [[figures of speech]], and other non-literal meanings.




Line 22: Line 30:
Many other interpretive aspects are introduced. For example, ''active zones'' {{comment|(fuzzier than it being a term suggests)}} refer to the fact that when actors act, it is usually some part and not the whole of them matters to the particular interaction. Verbs, specific use, and context will imply active zones (consider seeing, hitting, etc.), and helps disambiguate senses.
Many other interpretive aspects are introduced. For example, ''active zones'' {{comment|(fuzzier than it being a term suggests)}} refer to the fact that when actors act, it is usually some part and not the whole of them matters to the particular interaction. Verbs, specific use, and context will imply active zones (consider seeing, hitting, etc.), and helps disambiguate senses.


 
-->
==Ambiguity==
==Ambiguity==
<!--
Most any natural language is ambiguous at every level. Consider:
Most any natural language is ambiguous at every level. Consider:


Line 37: Line 46:




Statistical models are often used as a way of resolving the likely best interpretation,  
Some of these certainly matter to interpreting tasks, like [[coreference resolution]], and [[word embeddings]] choosing among its options.
with more tractable or at least simpler-to-build models than perceptually accurate models.




Statistical models are often used as a way of resolving a likely interpretation,
with more simpler-to-build models than fully interpreting / perceptually accurate models.


-->


==Compositionality==
==Compositionality==
<!--
Compositionality roughly means that the meaning of a non-trivial expression (word, phrase) is (fully) determined by its parts and the means of combination.
Compositionality roughly means that the meaning of a non-trivial expression (word, phrase) is (fully) determined by its parts and the means of combination.


Line 62: Line 74:
-->
-->


<!--


==Rhetoric==
==Rhetoric==


===Figures of speech===
===Figures of speech===
<!--
{{stub}}
{{stub}}


Line 72: Line 84:


See [[Figures of speech]]
See [[Figures of speech]]
 
-->
==Unsorted==
==Unsorted==
{{stub}}


<!--
<!--
Line 94: Line 105:
construal/conceptualization, and  
construal/conceptualization, and  
syntactic accommodation  
syntactic accommodation  
-->


==See also==
==See also==
<!--
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Figure_of_speech
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Figure_of_speech
-->
-->
Line 101: Line 114:
[[Category:Linguistics]]
[[Category:Linguistics]]
[[Category:Analytical linguistics]]
[[Category:Analytical linguistics]]
[[Category:Cognitive linguistics]]
[[Category:Semantics]]
[[Category:Semantics]]
[[Category:Pragmatics]]
[[Category:Pragmatics]]

Latest revision as of 00:51, 21 April 2024

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

Ambiguity

Compositionality

Rhetoric

Figures of speech

Unsorted

See also