Language families: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{stub}} <!-- Language families are for some part idealized, particularly if represented in a simple tree - because that's not how language change works. On this page, things...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
Language families are for some part idealized, particularly | Language families are for some part idealized, particularly when represented in a simple tree - because that's not how language change works, and not how simple most influences went. | ||
On this page, things are based mainly on analysed distances, interaction and such, and as such are primarily descriptive and regularly somewhat fuzzy on where exactly some languages belong, and which had effect on which. | On this page, things are based mainly on analysed distances, interaction and such, and as such are primarily descriptive and regularly somewhat fuzzy on where exactly some languages belong, and which had effect on which. | ||
Revision as of 22:09, 23 August 2016
✎ This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.
See also
Large language list:
- http://www.friesian.com/upan.htm
- http://alis.isoc.org/langues/grandes.en.htm
- http://www.ancientscripts.com/hl_families.html
- http://www.ethnologue.com/family_index.asp
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afro-Asiatic_languages
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nilo-Saharan_languages
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bantu
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khoi-san_languages