Social site alternatives: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Twitter is very much a network. Most things we call social sites are - maximum reach, maximum engagement | Twitter is very much a network. | ||
Most things we (pretty much incorrectly) call social sites are - maximum reach, maximum engagement -- because those mean more ad revenue - the basic business model. | |||
On twitter, you're there to find ''everyone''. | On twitter, you're there to find ''everyone''. | ||
Things like mastodon are set up more for communities than for networks. | |||
Instances are often specialized for like minds, shared interests. | |||
...and this interest may be 'shitposting like on twitter', and large common instances may work out that way, | ...and this interest may be 'shitposting like on twitter', and large common instances may work out that way, | ||
yet on instances that are more specific, this may get called off topic. | yet on instances that are more specific, this may get called off topic. | ||
You can still find pretty much everyone, but that is a secondary. | |||
===Mastodon=== | |||
The main differences | |||
* you have an account on a specific instance | |||
:: the people you want to connect with may be on different instances -- but chances are those will be | |||
it will probably be connecting to all the instances that the people | |||
Line 151: | Line 167: | ||
boost - what on twitter would be called retweet | |||