Web generation-y numbers: Difference between revisions

From Helpful
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 54: Line 54:
<!--
<!--


Looking at practice, IoT seems to mean collecting more data than ever before, and doing more potentially-useful things with them.
At its introduction, IoT seems to be about doing more potentially-useful things, and the automation and sensing we need to actually do that.


As such,  a lot of IoT talk is actually about


* thinking up new names for user tracking, business intelligence, ETL,
If you look at what IoT people actually talk about, it's more about
* thinking up newer gentle euphemisms for user tracking, business intelligence, ETL


* analytics that is ''probably'' a little more realtime
* analytics that is ''probably'' a little more realtime
: and the aggregation and preprocessing that requires
: the aggregation and processing that requires
: and the scaling you may need to do that on ever increasing amounts of data
: the scaling you may need to do that on ever increasing amounts of data


* concepts like [[data lakes]], management (e.g. ease of migration)
* concepts like [[data lakes]], management (e.g. ease of migration)


* machine learning
* machine learning
: because doing it yourself is not worth the effort in this mindset
: because, in this mindset, doing it yourself is not worth the effort
 
 


* ubiquitous computing


-->


===Security===
===Security===
<!--
<!--


As we all know, the S in IoT stands for Security.
"As we all know, the S in IoT stands for Security."




Line 88: Line 88:
IoT devices, though?
IoT devices, though?


Most of these will allow you to download the firmware, even make it easy,
It's a truism of security that this kind of physical access means you're screwed anyway.
and it's a truism of security that this kind of physical access means you're screwed anyway.
 
Most of these will allow you to download the firmware, even make it easy.
 
 
And sure, if it's a light sensor or digital thermometer, any ill results pretty well defined.
It'll be warmer, lighter, and maybe they'll find your wifi password - but maybe they needed that password to get onto your network anyway,
and there are probably other ways to get it if they're that close.




IF it's a light sensor or digital thermometer, any ill results pretty well defined.
If you buy a door lock with WiFi,
you'll probably intuitively consider what misbehaviour means,
and maybe use it on your garage but not your front door.


Even with a smart lock you'll probably intuitively consider what misbehaviour means,and maybe use it on your garage but not your front door.




Our alexa / nest / dot / google assistants.
Our alexa / nest / dot / google assistants.
Here it's not hardware, but the functionality itself that is easily considered risky, because the extent is hard to oversee even without extensibility.
Here it's not hardware, but the functionality itself that is easily considered risky,  
because the extent is hard to oversee out of the box.


And then we add extensibiity.
We're not really in control of what happens on there.


It doesn't help that many of these are new platforms, with unknown bugs.


And we consumers almost ''ask'' for that, because we're not sure what
they are able to do, what they should be able to do, and what they shouldn't.
Plus we're not really in control of what happens on there.


And then we add extensibility.


It doesn't help that many of these are new platforms, with unknown bugs.


Another is that it has to be easy to connect - that
And we consumers almost ''ask'' for that,
because we're not sure what they are able to do,
what they should be able to do, and what they shouldn't.





Revision as of 14:06, 12 March 2024


Web generations

While we've mostly been making fun of "Web 2.0" since what feels like the late nineties (but was actually a few years later), such terms have also still been used seriously, even if the descriptions are often the optimistism of its early plans rather than of its daily life.

Web 1.0

web of content
static web

Web 2.0

web of communication
basic participation

Web 3.0

web of context
semantic, smart ads/search

Web 4.0

web of things
mobile, personal assistant, connected space, AR

People disagree what we're on - some argue few of us are barely at doing 3 properly, some are on 5 because why not, and higher number is more better



Note that crypto bros have their own unrelated thing they also called called Web3. A decade later it is still not clear what what they mean, what goals that has, as it just seems to mean 'you know, money things with blockchain', and when it gets slightly technical it often bears no relation to anything else on the web.

Some of them have started saying Web4. Presumably because there's one born every minute.

We like numbering things, let's have more

Industry has been retroactively numbered too, because why not

Industry 1.0 - industrial revolution (~1760s)

Industry 2.0 - some electricical solutions (~1840s)

Industry 3.0 - computers introduced (~1970)

Industry 4.0 - more automating (~2000s), IoT

Industry 5.0 - more customization


Also

Quantified Self 2.0 (which surely is Mindfulness 2.0 and not the opposite)

IoT

Security