Common plugs and connectors

From Helpful
(Redirected from Kleintuchel)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Yes, this is largely biased to the stuff I deal with.

Ideally 'common' is true enough. Suggestions are welcome.


Mixed use (analog, digital, home electronics, audio)

TRS (Tip, Ring, Sleeve) and variations

3.5mm (1/8") TRS plug (bottom left),
2.5mm TRS plug (top)
6.35mm (1/4") TRS plug (right)


'TRS' may be clearer when distinguishing it from plugs in similar use, but the everyday names we use are more specific - and somewhat regional.

The 3.5mm is often known as headphone jack, stereo jack (if TRS, or mono jack if TS), mini jack, or 3.5mm jack, and sometimes things like mini-phone.

The 6.35mm was classically called phone connector (2-lead, TS) though perhaps the largest use today is guitars.


The history of plugs like these is complex[1], and there are some leftovers today that use less usual variants.

But what you're most likely to meet is primarily:

The 1/4" (which is 6.35mm precisely)
originates from the design of the first telephone exchanges(verify), which is why this (particularly the mono, TS variant) is also called a phone connector
These days they are mostly seen in audio use, seemingly as something not so easy to break
used for guitars, pro line level (balanced or not), and sometimes for consumer headphones
3.5mm
Americans often refer to it as 1/8"
best known for three-band (TRS) in headphones for stereo sound, then often referred to as audio jack, mini-jack, jack plug, stereo plug, and others. (Sometimes phone connector but that suggests the 1/4" one)
often carries consumer line level audio signals, or consumer microphone level when it involves microphones (often electret)
2.5mm
Americans sometimes call this 3/32"


On units - The 1/4 size is standardized in inches because of its phone network origins(verify),

...while 2.5mm and 3.5mm are standardized in millimeters, and I do believe always manufactured to mm sizes, so the inch figures are names, not measurements:
taking 3.5mm and calling it 1/8" is 10% away from the actual size (3.5mm is 0.138", not 0.125")
taking 2.5mm and calling it 3/32" is 5% away from the actual size



3.5mm TRRS plug

TS, TRS, TRRS, etc.

The original 1/4" had two contacts, so had a tip and sleeve (TS).

It grew more bands over time, so e.g. 3.5mm is frequently seen in TS, TRS, and occasionally TRRS. TRRRS exists but is rare.

3.5mm TRRS is

is probably mostly associated with having headphones that include a microphone, around smart phones.
has some other uses, like carrying audio and (composite) video on one plug (e.g. on raspberry pi)



Not-really-compatible variants

A few synthesizers (Buchla and clones(verify)) use tini-jax which is .141" (~3.6mm) and basically incompatible with 3.5mm


3.5mm that can be screwed down

I've also seen a variant of 3.5mm that can be screwed down, which is quite useful for use on stage where you don't want a yank to stop the music - yet e.g. in the image on the right the screw-thread ring on this plug doesn't pull back so this particular plug won't plug properly into most other 3.5 sockets.



See also:



TRS pinout

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

Pinout

Depends on the use. Things I've mostly dealt with:

  • 3.5mm TRS in consumer stereo sound (unbalanced)
tip: left
ring: right
sleeve: ground


  • 3.5mm TRRS for headphone, mic and/or buttons
The general standard (OMTP)
tip: left out
ring: right out
ring: mic in (and buttons(verify))
sleeve: ground
Apple being different: (CTIA)
tip: left out
ring: right out
ring: ground
sleeve: mic in


  • 3.5mm TRRS combining audio and analog video, such as
iPod's AV cable
tip: left
ring: right
ring: ground
sleeve: video
raspberry pi audio+video (same pinout)
there are pinout variants of this.
It's handy to have adapters with RCA, in that sometimes you can get around variations by plugging things differently. But don't count on it.


6.35mm TRS in socket.jpg
  • 6.35mm TRS headphones (unbalanced, same as 3.5mm consumer but sturdier; often with adapters to 3.5mm)
tip: left
ring: right
sleeve: ground
  • 6.35mm TRS balanced audio (stage/pro audio)
tip: hot
ring: cold
sleeve: shield
  • 6.35mm TS unbalanced audio (stage/pro audio)
guitar, instruments (unbalanced)
tip: signal
sleeve: ground
  • 6.35mm TRS: mixer effect inserts (unbalanced)
tip: out
ring: in
sleeve: ground
Music_-_studio_and_stage_notes#Insert



Note that in many uses, sleeve is ground (shield where applicable)

Headphone buttons

The buttons don't need extra wires in a TRRS plug because they'll be using different resistor values between mic and ground pins.

For Android[2]:

  0..70  ohm   Function A, play/pause/takecall
110..180 ohm   Function D, typically voice commands
210..290 ohm   Function B, volume up
360..680 ohm   Function C, volume down

(The impedance of the microphone itself is considerably higher, and sense-wise acts as the default)


For Apple,

~0   ohm is play/pause/takecall

Everything else seems to be proprietary signaling, which allows them to add functionality over time. And piss of imitators and DIYers.



RCA

Used for audio, video (often composite, now also component), some simple data (like non-optical digital audio)

Named for its introduction by the Radio Corporation of America.

Other names include cinch connector, phono connector, and some odd ones out like the Dutch calling it a tulpstekker (after tulips, because of course).


See also:


DIN

DIN refers to a whole standardization body.

Only with a number does it refer to a specific standard, of which there are many'. Which includes connectors.

But no one remembers those numbers, so we say "DIN connector" and leave it to context.

Note that

some of these have since been effectively moved into international (IEC) standards,
some DIN equivalents of something standardized elsewhere,
some are actively synchronized.
💤 Some other DIN things you might see with some frequency:
  • the larger circular DIN (see below)
  • the smaller circular mini-DIN (see below)
  • DIN 41651 (see below)
  • DIN 41652 is D-sub (though it wasn't DIN that created it) (verify) (see below)

Some other common-enough electrically-related DIN things:

DIN 41529
  • DIN 41612 backplanes (see below)
  • DIN 41529: 2-pin, historically seen in loudspeakers, though I've also seen them used for low voltage lighting
  • DIN 41585 antenna connector mostly used in cars
  • "7/16 DIN" Connectors[4], in RF
  • TODO: more

See also:


The larger circular DIN

Left: the 180-degrees 5-pin DIN.
Right: 4-pin mini-DIN - see the next section

Around consumer devices it most commonly refers to the members of a specific series of circular plug/sockets of similar design, that have a 13.2mm-diameter round metal friction locking shield. (These come from at least five different DIN standards, though it seems these original DIN standards are out of print, and you now want to read IEC 60130-9, which also expanded the series (verify))

This set includes:

DIN 41524: 3-pin, 90°, 180°      4-pin, 72°, 216°       DIN 41524 / IEC/DIN EN 60130-9: 5-pin, 45°, 180° 5-pin, 90°, cube, 270° DIN 45322: 5-pin, 60°, 240°       DIN 45522: 6-pin, 60°, 240°       DIN 45329 / IEC 10: 7-pin, 45°, 270°       DIN 45326 / IEC/DIN EN 60130-9: 8-pin, 45°, 270° 8-pin, 45°/41°, 262°


Being an existing, relatively sturdy, relatively versatile, and relatively cheap style of connector, these once saw a lot of varied use, be it digital (e.g. MIDI, AT keyboard connector), audio/video (e.g. tape decks, microphones), and sometimes power.

Many of them were fairly specific to brands or devices (e.g. Commodore 64 uses 7-pin for power, and 8-pin (5-pin in a few early models) for audio and composite video).


Many such uses have since grown more specific connectors. Which is probably good, to avoid smoky mistakes from too many distinct uses sharing a plug.

The only one that survived a lot longer in wide use is MIDI, with its 180 degree 5-pin din plug.


See also:

Mini-DIN

Mini-DIN is a similar-looking variation also from DIN ((verify), I can't easily find the number), with a 9.5mm round metal shield. Additionally uses plastic slots that makes plugging into other variants hard without a hammer.

These include:


Probably best known for

PS/2 keyboard/mouse (6-pin)
S-video (4-pin)


Other uses include audio, video, some communication, and some fairly one-off video card adapters back when analog video was still a thing we wanted.

Apparently the 8-pin mini-DIN connector was briefly used for iPods(verify)

I've also seen some used for power.

Warning: Assuming each of the unique connectors has multiple, unrelated uses, before you plug something in.


See also:


Mini-DIN lookalikes

Not a standard 7-pin mini-DIN plug.

There are a number of have the same 9.5mm housing as mini-DIN, but are not standardized or approved by DIN.

These include:


Some are designed to be compatible with specific standard mini-DIN (e.g. to have a video card socket that accepts both standard S-Video plug but also its own connects-more-stuff variant).

Others are designed to be specifically incompatible with standard mini-DIN.


Audio(-only)

TOSLINK, mini-TOSLINK

RC-5720, often referred to as TOSLINK. (what looks like copper is only there to protect and guide the fiber)

While TOSLINK specifies a few plugs, it is mostly associated with the optical EIAJ/JEITA RC-5720 plug, a.k.a. JIS F05 and CP-1201 - optical, mating with a square-ish shape.


In most contexts, this plug carries S/PDIF protocol (which itself can carry raw PCM, DTS, and AC-3).

Note that the exact same S/PDIF signal can also be carried over copper, then often connected via RCA or BNC, which involves fewer components and is really no more sensitive to EM noise - and avoids any conductor so cannot introduce ground loop issues.

You could argue lasers and fibers are cool, but really it's just a LED (because cheap and short-range), and something more akin to fishing wire (because more robust). That said, it was ahead of its time, and still not really replaced by another well known standard.



Mini-TOSLINK, which carries fiber to the tip of a 3.5mm TS-shaped plug

Mini-TOSLINK looks like a stereo jack (3.5mm TRS style) but carries the light to its tip.

This allows laptops (and other size-restrained devices) to have one small socket that provides either consumer 3.5mm analog audio, or SPDI/F style digital audio. It was seen e.g. on some portable MiniDisc players, some Apple laptops, and while it still exists it was was never hugely common.


There are physical adapters from TOSLINK to mini-TOSLINK.


See also:

Specialist (mostly audio)

XLR

XLR3, XLR4, XLR6

This is about XLR as the whole connector family.


If you care about XLR3 as used around microphones, see Microphone_cabling

If you care about XLR3 or XLR5 being used for DMX lighting, see DMX.


Diameter:

Exists in a number of variations

  • XLR3, seen as:
    • a balanced audio connector, primarily for microphones (in the past also some equipment interconnections and speakers, including powered ones - now less so, probably due that last bit leading to some pricy mistakes)
    • DMX in a lot of practice
    • AES/EBU digital audio (mostly in some older digital gear)
  • XLR4 - used e.g. intercoms, and apparently once relatively universal for power for in TV and film industries ,
  • XLR5 - in the DMX specs (but many simpler DMX devices use only XLR3 because two pins were never used)
  • XLR6

...and various others, some of which are considered obsolete.


The two most recognisable uses are probably in the event industry:

(also note that audio cables and DMX cables, while they look similar, are not interchangeable for other reasons. It'll work fine on a test-bench scale, but will have issues on large scale)




Notes:

  • These are occasionally also called Cannon, after the company that developed the basics of these a long time ago(verify) (now ITT[5])
LNE FC, LNE MP
  • There are also some lesser-seen and specific variants, such as
LNE, that carries just mains power ('Line, Neutral, Earth'), but was apparently never used much
PDN to go between amps and speaker


See also:



See also The_XLR_pin_1_problem

Kleintuchel

Kleintuchel

DIN 41524, a.k.a. kleintuchel (klein means small and Tuchel' is a company name -- so this is much like saying 'DIN plug' or 'RCA connector' - understood well enough, but only due to context), or something slightly more descriptive like "DIN with a screw ring".

Seen around some older microphones.


Three pins, for differential output and a shield, so basically the same idea as XLR.

Apparently easily adapted to XLR, though note that some companies were inconsistent with polarity on kleintuchel plugs, so when you use more than one mic in a setup, you may want to make these adapters microphone-specific if you care about phase mistakes.


In that (slightly distorting macro) image, the top is the cable, bottom is the microphone. That center hole is not functional or typical(verify).



Grosstuchel

Grosstuchel

DIN 41624, a.k.a grosstuchel

Seen around some older microphones.


Small mic plugs

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.


There are a few different small plugs and sockets that look somewhat like XLR, mostly seen on worn wireless microphones, some field recording kits, and otherwise fairly rare.

These seem to be used for being a locking plug that is fairly solid.


It seems that plugs can vary per manufacturer, pinouts can vary even if the same connectors are used (varying a little by brand and context), and some aren't even differential (not as necessary for short cables).


This seems to frequently be the plug called Switchcraft TA3 (The female TA3F on the microphone end).

"Mini XLR" doesn't really exist(verify), and seems to often refer to Switchcraft TA3, sometimes others like it(verify)


There is also a variant that uses TA4 connector (4-pin, TA4F on the microphone end), also with slightly varying pinouts.


I've seen TQG and Tiny-QG seemingly refer to both TA3 or TA4. Presumably this is Switchcraft trying to apply a brand/trademark?(verify).


Audio Technica seems to use a Hirose 4-Pin connector


I've also seen mention of LEMO plugs, and even just reuse of TRS.

The wiring link below seems a decent list.


See also:

XLR+TRS combo

Neutrik combo, accepts both XLR and 6.35mm TS/TRS

A single socket that accepts both XLR, and 1/4" (6.35mm) TS/TRS jacks.

Mainly used to save some space on audio devices that want to accept both of these pro-audio inputs in less (rack) space, because the two are not electrically connected.


I'm unsure whether Neutrik developed these, but there seems to be no singular name or singular producer(verify) (anymore), yet 'Neutrik Combo' seems to be one of the better-understood references.



https://www.neutrik.com/en/neutrik/products/plugs-jacks/jacks/combo-i-series

Speakon

Speakon

Neutrik Speakon is used in some professional audio, as a amp-to-speaker connection of an already amplified speaker signal.


It seems to have been introduced to be a unique, non-confusable plug, because it was (and still is) not uncommon to use TS plug that could carry either a voltage signal or already-amplified audio, which has the issue that plugging a powered output into a signal input would probably damage that input. (TS inputs are often protected against this, e.g. with a varistor, so that you don't blow up things so much)


See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speakon_connector

powerCON

Neutrik's powerCON is a few related connectors that connect 3-pole mains power (20A or 32A).

Rated for a little more current than typical wallplug interconnects, and smaller than most of them.

There is no standardized voltage(verify). Connectors are rated for 250V, but in 120V countries they'll typically connect that(verify).

There are variants that are rated IP65 while connected, which makes them useful for outdoor events.


powerCON blue / grey [6]

  • Type 1
source side
blue
locking (bayonet-style)
20A
not disconnectable under load
  • Type 2
drain side
grey
locking
20A
not disconnectable under load

Type 1 and 2 are intentionally different, so that it should be impossible to plug a short.


  • Powercon 32A [7]
32A
source side only?


  • TRUE1 (2011, now TRUE1 TOP?[8][9])
16A
disconnectable under load


  • type 1/2 variants redesigned to be disconnectable under load (verify)
2020?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerCon


Fiber

Video cables/plugs

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.


Composite video

Yellow RCA is associated with video use (much like red and black (or red and white) are with stereo sound)

Composite video (not to be confused with component video).

Usually plugs around in a one-yellow-RCA-plug way, sometimes using a BNC plug.

Carries Y, U, and V signals with sync pulses (and is also easy to broadcast - it is almost entirely the same as analog TV's format. ...in a baseband way, without modulation.)


The main upsides to composite is probably that it is easy to transfer video between devices with a single, simple, common plug.

The main downside is that it somewhat susceptible to various visual artifacts, including noise/interference, dot crawl.

It arguably varies mostly with the quality of the encoding/decoding hardware, which indeed has varied, and which is internal so you have no control over.

The only thing you could change is cable length. Shorter cables sometimes help a little.


Composite video is sometimes called CVBS. Depending on who you ask, that's short for "Color, Video, Blank and Sync", "Composite Video Baseband Signal", "Composite Video Burst Signal", or "Composite Video with Burst and Sync".


RF modulators

There was once a time where TVs only took antenna inputs, and therefore a time at which devices (like video tape recorders, early game consoles, and and some early computers) modulated their video a signal onto a local video channel, to then be decoded again by the TV.

That often amounted to composite + RF modulator = something TV understands.

S-Video

S-video plug, the wire carrying two pairs

S-Video (also Super Video or Separated Video, and also sometimes called Y/C) carries luma (Y) and chroma (C) signals on separate wire pairs, using standard 4-pin mini-DIN plugs.


It carries the same information as composite video, but avoids shoving the Y and C information together onto one wire.

This will be better than the cheapest implementations of composite -- yet with good hardware and ideal conditions for composite, S-Video is no better than composite.


S-Video-to-Composite-video converter cables can just join the wires (although this may mean the colors are less saturated - something about the voltage amplitudes of these two signals?(verify)).

...and for the same reason you can not use that same wire to go from composite input to S-Video output (connecting it anyway puts the mixed Y+C channel on both the Y and C pairs, which the S-video decoder will partly understand, but will usually results in a black and white image(verify))


S-Video-like

Not a standard 7-pin mini-DIN plug. This one is one end of a computer video card adapter cable

You may find some Mini-DIN_lookalikes that resemble the 4-pin mini-DIN S-Video plug. This includes:

  • a 9-pin variation called VIVO (Video In Video Out), seen on video cards, that allows S-Video in, S-Video out, component out, and composite out.
  • I've seen some video cards come with a 7-pin plug. This is rarely a standard mini-DIN plug, and often has its plastic slot in the same place as on the 4-pin DIN plug, but wider, so that the video card socket will accept a standard S-Video plug, and also the plug on the cable supplied with the card which uses the extra pins to carry, usually, another type of video (often composite video, sometimes composite video).
  • a different 7-pin connector (standard mini-DIN) used on some professional (VCR) kits



Component video (YPbPr)

Red, Green, Blue RCA (...which suggests component video)

Component video (not to be confused with composite video) could in theory refer refer to any system that sends video in multiple separated channels.

...but it quite usually refers specifically to a Y,Pb,Pr setup, typically on three RCA connectors (and sometimes on other things, like D-terminal), and for YPbPr these connectors are frequently red, green, and blue.

The green plug carries the Y signal (Luma),
the blue the Pb (blue minus yellow)
and the red the Pr (red minus yellow) signal


...not to be confused with RGB video, which also exists, in multiple forms (and which you could call component video in the wider sense)


See also Color_notes_-_color_spaces#YCbCr_and_YPbPr



SCART

Plug from a general purpose SCART interconnector cable
Two specific-purpose SCART plugs, with only the pins they need for audio and composite video in a specific direction

SCART (a.k.a. Euro AV, EIA Multiport) combines a bunch of analog audio and video formats used by various common plugs, making it somewhat easier to connect various common home devices.


SCART can carry:

  • Mono/Stereo Audio, both ways
  • Composite video, both ways
  • S-Video may be supported both ways, but isn't always implemented
  • RGB (on newer hardware, by re-purposing some wires, so both ends need to support and both to specifically this (ab)use)
Back of a SCART converter to composite and S-video, and RCA audio. The switch on top lets it act as input or output for each of these

You can easily find adapters to one or more specific things, like RCA audio, composite video and/or and S-Video, and sometimes versions with a switch that selects whether you want to use the converter plug to act as input or output.


RGB is higher quality, but was non-standard and added later

  • has to be supported by both sides
  • can also not be used at the same time as S-Video output
  • is only intended for one direction, player-to-display travel
so is supported primarily by some more modern TV sets (receiving role) and recent media players (sending role)
  • supporting players may only send RGB once you explicitly configure them for it, for compatibility reasons.


See also:


VGA

DE-15, also named HD-15 (and also, somewhat incorrectly, DB15 and HDDB15), used for VGA monitor connections

VGA technically refers to Video Graphics Array, a specific video card from the late eighties that set a graphics standard, including the 640x480 resolution (though any VGA card already did more than that)

As other graphics cards appeard, it came to refer to the connector used (DE-15) and the way it carries image signals, which stuck around for a long time and which supports much higher resolutions (over short cables).

While it's a 15-pin connector, there's a lot of redundancy in there. Most important are five signals, and ground:

  • hsync
  • vsync
  • red pixel data
  • green pixel data
  • blue pixel data
  • ground

Four further pins were reserved for DDC (Display Data Channel) to help PCs identify monitor capabilities. DDC saw a few different schemes and protocols over time (including pulldown resistors, one-directional serial, and I2C). one pin is 5V to power the EEPROM used in some of these schemes, but is otherwise unused.


On ground: Pinouts may show the center row all grounds and interconnected, but in most cables these are individual paths, a separate ground - e.g. red and 'red ground' in a twister for lower interference(verify), etc.


💤 Limits

VGA made sense when monitors were cathode ray tubes and their scanning beam made them all-analog in nature - you had to convert it to analog somewhere, and they chose to do it in the graphics card.

Connecting flatscreens via VGA makes less sense electronically: We have a digital image with discrete pixels in the PC, the eventual screen pixels are discrete, but we convert it to analog, to carry as analog, then convert analog back to digital. Yes, the timing is usually pretty good, but it's an unnecessary intermediate step, asking for mild analog signal losses, and the DAC-then-ADC steps means a little ghosting and similar can happen and aren't really resolvable. Particularly for the faster speeds required for higher resolutions and/or longer cables. We moved on to digital communication for our monitors for a reason.

At the same time, I see pages being cautious about 1080p but we've had resolutions higher than that since the nineties, and it's fine pushing through 1080p60 through any but the cheapest cables. Yet being analog, this is also roughly the point it starts being a concern, because higher resolutions quickly start demanding ~300MHz of bandwidth. It's fine over a short, decent- quality cable, but cheaper and/or longer cables will be trouble, and certain conversions aren't ideal either)

}}


Also, it can be a fun to mess with those analog voltages - see also VGA hacking



D-Terminal

D-terminal plug
This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

D-Terminal (not to be confused with D-Subminiature a.k.a. D-Sub) is probably most common in Japan, and seen elsewhere mostly in specific applications, e.g. digital satellite tuners.

In that use the wires carry component video, and also signal lines that use logic-level voltages to signal the video's resolution, ratio, and whether it is interlaced/progressive.

This has five modes, carrying analog 480i through 1080p, varying with the actual devices, and sockets may be labeled with D1 through D5 as indication of what a device is capable of, which seems to include:(verify)

  • D1 480i (525i): 720×480 Interlaced
  • D2 480p (525p): 720×480 Progressive
  • D3 1080i (1125i): 1920×1080 Interlaced
  • D4 720p (750p): 1280×720 Progressive
  • D5 1080p (1125p): 1920×1080 Progressive


Breakout cables to component video over RCA and BNC exist.(verify)


I'm not clear on how/whether this is related to (mini)-centronics.(verify) - might this effectively be mini-MDR14?


See also:


Digital video cables (high speed and/or uncompressed)

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

Such as:

DVI

DVI pinout chart (click for details)

On digital and/or analog

DVI can carry both analog and digital video, but specific wires and interfaces can choose to do just one.

DVI connector variants (male)


There are roughly four variants. To tell them apart,

  • look at the plate on one side
if there are pins around that plate (red in the pinout image on the right), the cable can carry analog video.
if the nearest 3x3 pins is a full block, it can carry digital video
it's called DVI-A if it can carry only analog
it's called DVI-D if it can carry only digital
it's called DVI-I if it can carry both
  • If everything is one solid block of pins (that is, includes the blue pins in the image on the right), it can do dual-link digital.
If it's not full, it's single-link digital.



There are some other connectors that look roughly like DVI but are incompatible, such as:

And two different many-pin connectors, often seen for many-monitor graphics cards, as each connector can be used for two monitors:

Needs an adapter for things like DVI or VGA (doesn't carry them directly). The absence of pin 58 in DMS-59 seems to be just for keying. It isn't used in LFH either(verify), so you can use DMS-59 cables where you would otherwise use LFH.(verify)


See also:


MiniVGA, MiniDVI, MicroDVI, Mini DisplayPort

Mini-VGA (socket circled, plug on top)

Mini VGA

  • mainly seen in Apple hardware (mostly MacBooks) circa 2005(verify)
  • not standardized, died out fairly quickly
  • replaced by Mini DVI (which could also go to VGA) and MiniDisplayPort (which does even more)
  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mini-VGA


Mini-DVI plug

Mini DVI


MicroDVI, again mostly Apple, was used on some Macbook Airs.


All of the above were discontinued circa 2010, in favour of Mini DisplayPort.



Mini DisplayPort (again, for a Macbook)

Mini DisplayPort

  • Initially in Apple laptops, now adopted by VESA and used by other vendors
  • There are converters to VGA, (Dual-Link) DVI, HDMI, Displayport, and probably more
  • May also carry audio, may not.
  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mini_DisplayPort


Other Apple connectors

Lightning
Lightning plug

Thunderbolt is, by name, somewhat confusable with lightning (introduced 2012, now being displaced by USB-C (slower than you might expect, possibly because of proprietary sales reasons)).

Lightning is the thin flat reversible plug with little strips of connector.

There are eight pins, carrying

  • Vcc and Gnd (charging),
  • two differential pairs that can carry USB (and has active adapters to HDMI, VGA, Audio, and apparently SD card reading).

It is almost exclusive to iPhone, iPad, iPod, and a handful of Apple accessories. Lightning replaced the earlier dock connector (and e.g. lightning headphones made sense to make where 30-pin dock headphones didn't really).


Dock connector

30-pin dock connector (since 2003, and mostly disappeared since Lightning in 2012).

Apple 30-pin dock plug

which seems to carry:

  • USB
  • stereo audio in
  • stereo audio out
  • S-video
  • FireWire
  • Serial (used by iPod? 19200 baud?)
  • pin that let accessories indicate roughly what they are, e.g. used for "please output audio into me" (verify)
  • 3.3V
  • 5V
  • 12V (for firewire)
  • various Gnd (separate for power and some of the signals)

(the connector itself seems to be a non-standard variant of JAE DD1. Apple seems to have intentionally made it hard to get, though you can e.g. still get some breakout boards)


HDMI

Typical HDMI plug (Type A, 19 pins)

High-Definition Multimedia Interface (HDMI) [10]

Can carry digital video, and digital audio.

There are plug variants.

HDMI variants
  • Type A is by far the most common, what you usually use
  • Type B has more data lines, designed for very-high-bandwidth applications, but never got used. DisplayPort now make more sense in practice
  • Type C is the mini variant (meant for small/mobile devices)
seen e.g. on Raspberry Pi Zero
  • Type D is the micro variant (meant for small/mobile devices)
seen e.g. on Raspberry Pi 4
  • Type E is an automotive variant - locks in place, more resistant to moisture and dirt
you can also get type A in a harness, giving similar features while being compatible with existing cables


(For computers it can be relevant that HDMI can carry DVI-D fairly directly - though this will probably only work if the DVI device supports HDCP (copy protection), because the HDMI side is likely to require it)



CEC (Consumer Electronics Control) is for simple commands between a set of interconnected devices, e.g. allowing your TV remote to control some common functions of a set-top or DVD player, have a device turn the TV on and to it as a source, control volume, transfer a preferred device name, things like that.

CEC is mostly known under names like Anynet+ (Samsung), 1-Touch Play (Roku), and various names involving 'Link' (lots of brands).

Electrically it is a one-wire bidirectional serial bus, separate from HDMI communication so that everything but this can sleep, and is very slow (~400bit/s) because it doesn't need to be faster.

See also:





DisplayPort

DisplayPort plug


Digital transfer; can carry video, audio, data, and a little power (for adapters?).

Because it was aimed to be a replacement of HDMI, DVI, VGA, and things like FPD-Link, it was made with compatibility in mind.


The signaling is not directly compatible with DVI or HDMI, but adapters are not complex. While VGA adapters have to be active, they can be powered through the DP cable (if short(verify), which most are).



Cable length

Specs say 2 or 3 meter max.

This is a cautious figure and decent cable quality may go a little longer, in part because it's only higher speeds that run into trouble.

But don't count on more than 10-20m, and then only for for lower(-data-rate) resolutions.

Active cables could go up to 15-30m at somewhat higher rates/resolutions in a more compliant, less fragile way. (Note that active cables must be connected in the right direction - passive cables don't care).

If you want more than that, you probably want fiber DP instead of copper DP (at high enough rates and distances, the issue is capacitance and sort of unavoidable).


A Dual-mode DisplayPort output (a.k.a. DP++) supports the use of an adapter to single-link DVI or HDMI. (a passive adapter in that the output itself already speaks the right thing, the adapter only changes voltages)

Without this, only an active adapter (something that does a conversion between different video formats inside it) would work.

Other conversion formats (e.g. to VGA) always require this.


Bandwidth

A single lane (differential pair) in a DP cable can be run at one of four speeds,

  • 1.6GBit/s raw, ~1.3GBit/s data in RBR (reduced bit rate)
  • 2.7GBit/s raw, ~2.1GBit/s data in HBR mode
  • 5.4GBit/s raw, ~4.3GBit/s data in HBR2 mode (introduced in DPv1.2)
  • 8.1GBit/s raw, ~6.5Gbit/s data in HBR3 mode (introduced in DPv1.3)

Cables made for higher speeds will often be 4-pair, which means:

  • 4-pair HBR is ~8 Gbit/s (~10Gbit/s raw minus 20% coding overhead)
  • 4-pair HBR2 is ~17 Gbit/s (~21Gbit/s raw minus 20% coding overhead)
  • 4-pair HBR3 is ~25 Gbit/s (~32Gbit/s raw minus 20% coding overhead)


Your average monitor will just work on most any cable. Making 1080p fail on a short cable would take effort.


You would only care about these numbers if you use a combination of 4K, deep color, 120fps, and 3D, e.g.

3840×2160@120fps requires HBR2,
5120x2880@60Hz require HBR3
multiple displays on a single port can be done


Mini-DisplayPort
Actually thunderbolt, but it's the same socket

Like it says - a smaller plug that carries DisplayPort.

Seen used on laptops in general, and Apples in general, for monitors

Also used on Apples for Thunderbolt (1 and 2)

See also:


GVIF

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

Gigabit Video Interface (GVIF), carried by a single twisted pair of wires, also allowing a data channel.

Plugs vary.

Used mostly in a few automotive uses, and then largely video-only. Up to 10 meters, up to ~2GBit.


(Not to be confused with GSIF, GigaSampler InterFace)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigabit_Video_Interface

UDI

UDI (Unified Display Interface) [11] [12]

Seems to never have made it out the door, apparently deprecated in favour of DisplayPort(verify)

SDI

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

SDI (Serial Digital Interface) is an uncompressed digital video (and audio) signal, originating around 1989 and to this day mostly seen in professional use.

Electronically:

BNC connectors, coax with 75 Ohm characteristic impedance (which was the same cabling as analog video setups, which helped upgrades, but also some confusion)
800 mV peak to peak (but receiver can deal with lower, meaning in clean environments you could have maybe 300m runs of ~270 Mbit (SD-)SDI without repeaters - though that's pushing it in ways you often don't want to, and will be have to be rather shorter in messier environments).


Speed variants over time:

SD-SDI: ~170..360 Mbit, allows 480i, 576i

ED-SDI: ~500 Mbit, allows 480p, 576p

HD-SDI: ~1.5GBit, allows 720p, 1080i (common for a long time?)

Dual link HD-SDI (2002): ~3GBit, allows 1080p60

3G-SDI (2006): ~3 GBit, allows allows 1080p60 (and can be easier than dual-link HD-SDI)

6G-SDI (2015)

12G-SDI (2015)

See also:

HDBaseT

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDBaseT

NDI

Network Device Interface (NDI) is a protocol that amounts to video over IP (with mDNS for discovery).


It's not a connector - but that said, hardware devices that speak NDI (cameras, monitors) tend to have a gBit ethernet interface (8P8C connector, 'RJ45'). (You could run it over wifi, but due to the bandwidth requirements, this may not work well except in some wifi-quiet places - but in practice that means you will have little control over potential problems)


The protocol focuses on being fairly low latency

  • the classical ('Full Bandwidth') NDI codec is lowish compression to get that low latency
  • NDI HX uses H.264, NDI HX2 uses H.265, considerably less bandwidth but both with higher latencies


See also Local_and_network_media_routing_notes#NDI for a few more implementation details.


See also

Specialized or internal display connectors

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

SlimPort (an implementation of Mobility DisplayPort)[13]

over micro-USB connector, but not standard USB so both devices must specifically support it.
Seems intended for supporting phones/tablets(verify)


MHL (Mobile High-Definition Link)[14]

intended for supporting phones/tablets, designed to use existing connector like micro-USB, and to HDMI


PDMI (Portable Digital Media Interface)[15]

a 30-pin connector that carries DisplayPort, USB, analog audio


Display Serial Interface (DSI)[16] \:aimed at being a simpler thing for mobile use.

Also seen referred to as MIPI, the ones who specced it.
Seen e.g. on Raspberry Pi, some STM32.
Note that Camera Serial Interface (CSI) may be possible on the same connector(verify)
The connection is one clock lane and one or more differential data lanes, and seems tested to about 1Gbps/lane(verify)
There is no singular connector, but there are not a lot either. For example,
Raspberry Pi settled expose 2 lanes on a 15-pin connector.
Compute Module 4 puts 4 lanes on a 22 pin, smaller-pitch connector (you can connect 15-pin screens with an adapter cable)
In practice, what MIPI cameras/monitors monitors actually have may well be the limiting factor for many hobbyists.
Many will say "For raspberry pi" or such.
If it mentions 800x480, that's at least partly because that's roughly the limit of 2-lane DSI(verify)


MDDI (Mobile Display Digital Interface) -


LVDS LCD - ?


FPD-Link (Flat Panel Display Link)[17]

used in many laptops
based on LVDS


OpenLDI - based on FDP-Link[18]

ended up mostly used for some specific things like medical devices, construction equipment


iDP - fewer wires than FDP-link


Power - wall plugs

The types are a less formal(verify) way of indicating the common plugs to use around the world.

See:


Some of the more common plugs are listed below (lettering system as used by some US document on worldwide power)



Some practical knowledge before traveling: https://www.electricalsafetyfirst.org.uk/guidance/advice-for-you/when-travelling/travel-adaptors/



Type F / Schuko / CEE 7/4

(Europe)


Type F plugs/sockets, also known as Schuko (short for Schutzkontakt, roughly meaning 'protective contact', referring to having a contact for protective earth), and standardized in CEE 7/4, are round sockets/plugs with two earth clips on the side, and two guides for a more robust fit in the embedded socket.

It is used in much of (western) Europe, commonly seen in wall sockets and power strips.

Not polarized, though there is an Argentinian variant that apparently is.



The Russian Gost 7396 looks and is similar, but has thinner prongs, so while you can often plug Gost into Schuko sockets, Schuko plugs often don't fit into Gost sockets(verify).


CEE 7/7 plugs

CEE 7/7 plug

Worth mentioning because it is designed to work in multiple distinct earthed sockets:

Type F style earth (most of western Europe) and
Type E style earth (France, Belgium, also Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Denmark).


Seen in wires that must be earthed (so can't be europlugs) and meant for wide sales (that is, catching both type E and type F countries with the same plug). One good example is computer power supply cables, which are usually CEE 7/7 to C13.



Other, non-earthed European plugs: Type C, Europlug, CEE 7/16, CEE 7/17

Type C exists in round and flat variants.


CEE 7/16, Europlug, also common on wall-wart adapters

flat type C, also formalized as CEE 7/16, and regularly called 'Europlug' , is an unearthed plug that fits most European-style sockets (Type C, E, F, others).

Some power strips have a few thin-type-C sockets (and Schuko otherwise), because you'll always have a few devices with these and it saves space in that case (and in that case only, as these sockets accept nothing else).

See also:

CEE 7/17 plug

The CEE 7/17 plug is a something of an unearthed adaptation of 7/16 to mate with Type E, Type F, and round type C sockets.





There is also an unearthed round Type C. This is typically considered old, and rarely seen sold anymore, for a few reasons. socket is CEE 7/1, plug is CEE 7/2.

While the socket (7/1) will accept most any European-style plugs (C, E, F; 7/4, 7/7, others), the round type C plug (7/2) will only really plug into the 7/1 socket, and roughly nothing else, notably not the Schuko socket - it will not plug into Type E or F sockets (blocked by the plastic that guides the earth).

New installations will very typically use only earthed sockets, so the 7/1 socket is harder to find now.



Type E

Type E socket (CEE 7/5) and plug (CEE 7/6)

Seen mostly in France, Belgium, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Denmark(verify)

Looks much like Type C, except for the male ground pin that sticks out.


While it has a fixed orientation, there is no polarization standard. (possibly because that would not apply to other european-style plugs it is fairly compatible with)


CEE 7/7 plug is made to be compatible with E as well as F

Also compatible with others, including (mostly things specifically designed for C, E, and F sockets)

  • 7/7 plugs (european earthed round plugs)
  • 7/17 plugs (the unearthed but still roundish one)
  • and 7/16 plugs (flat unearthed europlug)



Type A, Type B, household NEMA variants, JISC C 8303 Class II

(North America, Japan, some other places)

Type A (NEMA 1-15) plug
Type B (NEMA 5-15) plug

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NEMA_connector

NEMA 5-15 wall socket (a.k.a. Type B)
5-20 socket

Mainly:

  • NEMA 1-15 is the typical 2-prong non-earthed plug, a.k.a. Type A
  • NEMA 5-15 is the typical 3-prong earthed plug, a.k.a. Type B

...both rated for 15 amps (with a suggestion of doing no more than ~1300W, because there's a rule that a continuous load should stay under 80% of the rating).


NEMA actually defines a lot more plugs than that

mostly for
higher currents - 20, 30, 50, 60A, and/or
higher voltages, and/or
doing so on 3-phase (rather less common than split-phase)
(...all three of which are fairly rare outside of commercial or industrial settings)
...most of which you won't see in everyday life
you may well have seen NEMA 5-20 (horizontal blade on plug, T-shape on socket to accept both 5-15 and 5-20) in commercial settings
and the four-prong 14-30 (once also the three-prong 10-30 that had no ground), for power-hungry 240V devices at home (like driers)

See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AC_power_plugs_and_sockets#North_American_and_IEC_60906-2


Polarity

US socket polarization was once central to basic safety, so basically all sockets are polarized.

At the same time, apparently the oldschool 2-pin plug was symmetrical (and the 3-pin wallsocket wasn't required until the seventies)

Many modern devices won't care, and when they use an unearthed (2-pin) 1-15 plug, they can allow it to be plugged in both ways. When they do care about polarization, they do so by having one of the plug's prongs be wider (that's neutral) than the other (that's hot), which will only plug into typical 2-pin or 3-pin sockets one way.

The 3-pin plugs often don't need to bother(verify) with these different sizes, because the presence of the ground pin enforces the polarity.

So yes, you can wire a socket wrong, which is technically unsafe, though practically only for very old devices that connect the chassis to neutral(verify).


Holes?

Various plugs have holes in the prongs. This is not, as some believe, for more friction, or to slot into anything.

It's a manufacturing side effect. In fact, NEMA seems to intentionally spec that if they're there, they should specifically be away from the actual mating part of the surface, so that it doesn't reduce contact area. [19]



Type G, BS 1363 (UK)

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

Used in the UK and a dozen other countries[20]


Type G plug and socket
  • Oriented
  • polarized in the standard (though many everyday devices won't care)


Safety features:

  • Earth prong is longer, so a device is earthed before it gets power
  • Sockets may have safety shutters (actuated by the longer earth prong)
  • Newer variants have the non-ground pins half shielded so it's very hard to reach live copper


Other apparent design considerations:

  • All sockets are the same (there is no unearthed socket design)
  • Fuses in the plug - often easier to replace than those in the devices
  • Wire from bottom means people won't often try to pull it out from the wire, so few break that way (though possibly more break unintentionally)


See also:


BS 1363 replaced the earlier BS 546 in the 1940s, 1950s. BS 546 is still in use elsewhere, see Type D, M


There is also a distinct shaver socket, BS 4573, which looks like a thicker variant of europlug.




Type I

Type I plug and sockets

(Australia, New Zealand, China, Argentina)


Type N

South Africa, and a variant seen in Brazil

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AC_power_plugs_and_sockets#Type_N

Type H

Israel

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Israeli-type-H-plugs-and-socket.jpg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AC_power_plugs_and_sockets#Israel_SI32_(Type_H)

Type J

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

Switzerland, also seen in Lichtenstein

Europlug will plug into this, earthed variants (or other variants) from elsewhere in europe will not.


Not to be confused with type N


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AC_power_plugs_and_sockets#Swiss_SN_441011_(Type_J)

Type L

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

Italy mostly sees type L, C, and F

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AC_power_plugs_and_sockets#Italy_(Type_L)

Type K

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

Denmark

Phase and neutral distance and pins compatible with Schuko/europlug.


Earth is a half-round pin on the plug,

Danish grounded plugs will only fit into a grounded socket.

However, non-Danish european plugs (type E, type F) plugs will mate, but without connecting ground.


https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=type+K+plug&title=Special:MediaSearch&go=Go&type=image

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AC_power_plugs_and_sockets#Danish_Section_107-2-D1_earthed_(Type_K)


Less-common Danish variants include

  • one pin flat, used in hospitals
  • phase and neutral pins slanted, for computer equipment, though reportedly this is more annoying than it is useful.

https://www.plugsocketmuseum.nl/Danish2.html

Type D, M

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.


BS 546 is the older british plug, and also seen in India, Pakistan, some East African countries, South Africa,

Note that these countries may have other plugs. For example, it seems that:

India sees C, D, and M
Pakistan mainly sees C and D
South Africa sees C, D, M, and N


Three round pins.

There are three different plugs, with larger pins spaced further apart, each with their own current rating.

Because of the three distinct sizes, the three varied plugs will only plug into a socket rated for the same current, although there are sockets that take multiple variants.

The 2 A and 5 A plug are considered Type D, the 15 A plug Type M.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AC_power_plugs_and_sockets#BS_546_and_related_types_(Type_D_and_M)

https://www.plugsocketmuseum.nl/OldBritish1.html

Type O

When does wall polarity matter?

Power - device side

Low/medium voltage, device side

...e.g. adapters, battery packs, solar panels, and such.

Meaning up to a dozen volts, generally up to an amp or two.


DC connectors, EIAJ power, coaxial and more

A bunch of them (see list on the left)
This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.


A lot more plugs get used for this - because particularly under 20V there are few requirements, so a lot of plugs are fine to use in physical terms.

Perhaps the most recognizable is the concentric barrel-style (some of them within the EIAJ set, some not), which is probably also the subset least likely to be used for other things.

Most are not so much standardized as they are used by convention.

Low-voltage power, usually DC.


The image on the right is a selection of connectors from one of those "20 in one DC adapter kit".

From top to bottom:

  • 2.5mm TS
  • 3.5mm TS (confusable with audio)
  • 5.0mm barrel (~6.2mm tip) (verify)
  • EIAJ-01 (2.35mm barrel, 0.7mm inner diameter)
  • 3.5mm barrel (1.35mm(verify) inner diameter)
  • EIAJ-02 (4.0mm barrel, 1.7mm inner diameter)
  • 5.5mm barrel, for 1.5mm pin
  • 5.5mm barrel, for 2.5mm pin


The common 5.5mm thick DC plug with 2.5mm pin (socket and plug)

Terms, standards, plugs:

  • IEC 60130-10 (:1971) defines five/seven connectors
    • Type A: 5.5 mm outer diameter, 2.1 mm inner diameter (seems the most common?)
    • Type A: 5.5 mm outer diameter, 2.5 mm inner diameter
    • Type B: 6.0 mm outer diameter, 2.1 mm inner diameter
    • Type B: 6.0 mm outer diameter, 2.5 mm inner diameter
    • Type C: 3.8 mm outer diameter, 1.4 mm inner diameter
    • Type D: 6.3 mm outer diameter, 3.1 mm inner diameter
    • Type E: 3.4 mm outer diameter, 1.3 mm inner diameter
  • 'EIAJ connector' usually refers to one of the EIAJ RC-5320A connectors, rather than the other two:
  • EIAJ RC-5320A [21] defines five different thicknesses of barrel pairs rated for 2A. Yellow-tipped DC connectors are likely to be one of these.
    • EIAJ-01: 2.35mm thick barrel, 0.65mm thick pin (verify)
    • EIAJ-02: 4.0mm thick barrel, 1.65mm pin (verify)
    • EIAJ-03: 4.75mm thick barrel, 1.65mm pin (verify)
    • EIAJ-04: 5.5mm thick barrel, 3.4mm pin (verify)
    • EIAJ-05: 6.5mm thick barrel, 4.4mm pin (verify)
    • EIAJ RC-5320A
note that this is simplified -- these have inner and outer diameter for both plug and socket
  • EIAJ RC5322
    • Barrel type connectors, 6mm outer, 3.1mm inner radius. Pin is 1.0mm
    • wide (6.5mm) plastic tip, apparently to avoid contact in cars and such
    • EIAJ RC-5322


Telling which one you have or need is sometimes be a bit of a challenge.

Small mismatches on the slightly-smaller side tend to be okay, because these are often held by spring contacts.

Barrel sockets often don't have a solid inside but two (spring?) contacts.

So e.g. a socket made for 5.5mm outer, 2.1mm inner diameter
will likely also accept 4mm 2.1mm,
and probably 5.5mm 2.5mm.
though a 5.5mm outer, 3.4mm inner may not make contact.

However, a socket with a 2.5mm pin won't accept a 2.1mm inner-diameter.



The polarity for DC barrel type is typically tip-positive, i.e. the pin-inside is positive, the outide is negative.

The main notable exception is audio effect pedals.




See also:


3-Pin and 4-Pin DC Plugs

Apparently KPPX-4P
This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.


When you see pins thick enough to do more than signal, you are often looking at DC power plugs.

There seem to be a bunch of these, most probably unrelated in origin, probably unified mostly in "seems solid, had has the two/three/four thick-enough pins I need", some of which seem to be niche de facto standards.

Many don't seem to have any singular standard, name, or pinout, though I've seen various with specific keying shapes that do make them a very specific plug.

I've not made a selection of these to show here - you're on your own for now.


Everyday names seem to include:

  • snap and lock (though not all variants lock),
  • (incorrectly(verify)) power mini-DIN, power DIN - misleading as this does not mate with any mini-DIN plugs or sockets, because of the thicker pins than DIN, and often larger shell (the ones I saw were ~10mm instead of mini-DIN's 9.5mm)


Often used to deliver two different voltages, possibly at a little more current than basic DC plugs are comfortable with.




Seen in cars or RC

Cigarette lighter plug

Known as cigar(ette) lighter plug, vehicle receptible, and others. Also called a 12V plug, since this is usually what is provided (some exceptions).


Note that there are actually three variations of this plug, with mildly different sizes.

Since many have plugs with multiple millimeters of spring on the side, they tend to be more or less interchangeable, though some combinations may be too loose, or too tight.


See also:


More specific, less standard (car, low voltage/data)

OBD-II
This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.
OBD-II plug

On-Board Diagnostics is only required is to transmit emission-related data(verify), but typically also exposes a bunch of other information useful for mechanics to give clues to problems - mostly live values from the engine, and logged errors[22].


There were a few mostly-proprietary things that had implemented this idea.

OBD-II was the first wider standardization of the idea.


In the plug, aside aside from power (12 or 24V battery, and chassis ground)

It can carry three different standard things:

  • CAN (ISO 15765-4, SAE J2284)
a 41.6Kbps PWM (on two wires, plus ground) or
a 10.4Kbps Variable Pulse Width (on one wire, plus ground)

...plus seven pins of "whatever the manufacturer thinks up"



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On-board_diagnostics#OBD-II_diagnostic_connector

OBD-II pinout

SAE connector
SAE connector (and a die for size reference)

DC power.

Mates with an identical plug. Seen in motorcycles, cars, batteries for such, some solar panels, and such.

Meant to be wired so that the exposed lead from the power source may safely touch the car chassis.

See also:


Mostly seen in RC applications


Deans ultra
Deans ultra


The Deans Ultra is a polarized connector made to carry serious current for its size (smaller than e.g. Tamiya), largely because of the connector shape.

I've seen connectors called "T plug" that seem to be knockoffs.

Flat contacts, one side with springs that push the other side for good contact area.

Rated up to 60A. (but there are some cheap imitations that you don't want to push that high - I recall some rated at 10A(verify))


There is also a smaller micro Deans, rated for a dozen amps.



Powerpole
PP30(verify).
You shouldn't be able to touch those contacts once in the shrouds.
Mixing colors to show how they mate, you should probably not do that in practice.
This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

The plug mates with another copy of itself, and shields its contacts from direct touch, and e.g. touching a car chassis.

Powerpoles are somewhat larger than other choices - but unless you don't have the space, that can be a feature in that it makes it mechanically easier to pull apart (than some other high-amp choices), and may last somewhat longer.

Due to the shape of the contacts they should never fall apart, but if you're worried (e.g. in moving mechanisms) there are retention clips.


Anderson Powerpole (also known as sermos(verify)) refers to a family of connectors, apparently mostly:

  • PP10-30
  • PP15/45
  • PP75
  • PP120
  • PP180

Note that Anderson is a wider company with many other products, some of which even look like powerpoles, like Anderson SB50, which also seem to use the same contacts as PP75 (verify), but have casings with specific keyings.


Spec-wise

When people say 'powerpole' they often mean PP15/45 - which are three(verify) variants that share the same housing.

The number relates to amperage spec, which has slightly different contacts good for 15A, 30A, or 45A(verify), (though the specs suggest options in which it can be higher and lower than what the model number suggests) and takes different thicknesses of wire more easily.



Combinations

The plastic can also slot into the next side by side, horizontally and/or vertically.

There seem to be variants that amount to two of these already bonded side by side (either direction)

There are also shells without plugs, that let you collect individual and/or bonded variants(verify) into a larger sort of plug.



See also:

Tamiya
Tamiya connector

Tamiya is regularly seen in RC battery packs. Seems to refer to the plastic's plug/hole shapes (resembles a 2-pin Molex Mini-Fit Jr.) that make this a polarized connection (the square one is positive, the rounded-on-one-side one is ground).

Tamiya seems to be considered a cheapish choice that is good enough for up to a few amps. Or more, depending on the shape and material of the actual connectors(verify).

Also exists in mini variation.


EC3
EC2, EC3, EC5 and EC8

EC3 is a polarized plastic plug around banana-style connectors, and rated to approx 60A. They're relatively cheap(verify), so are handy all-round plugs.

People report them being a little easier to separate than Deans. The plastic may deform when things do heat up, though.

Of the variants, EC3 seems most common, but there seem to be at least a EC5, a small EC2, and a chunky EC8 as well.





XT60
XT60 and XT90

XT60 is a polarized bullet-based plug rated for ~60A, and uses plastic that deals with temperature better (...though 60A is a bunch).

There are more variants of this, like XT30 and XT90

See also




Mains power, device side

IEC 320 connectors

Refers to IEC 60320 (IEC 320 before the renumbering), the plug/socket system commonly used on devices which can use various socket-to-device wires.

The male and female versions of a type connector have different numbers.

C1 through C24 are defined.

For a few there are variations (e.g. C7/C8), and some are variants of other IEC plugs (e.g. C17/C18 is unearthed variant of C13/C14).


The most common are probably:

C14
(pairs with C13)
C13
(pairs with C14)
  • C13/C14, commonly associated with PC power supplies, and other devices that may need its moderate current rating (over e.g. C5/C6), including some professional audio equipment.
    • Rated at 10A



C19
  • C19/C20
    • Rated at 16A
    • seen where you may need a bit more current than C13/C14 gives
e.g. computer racks may have C19-to-C14 or C19-to-C20 Power Distribution Units


C6
(pairs with C5)
C5
(pairs with C6)
  • C5/C6, regularly seen in laptop power supplies and other PC-related power supplies (smaller than C19/20, still grounded)
    • rated for 2.5A



C8
(pairs with C7)
C7
(pairs with C8)
  • C7/C8 (a.k.a. 'figure eight', 'shotgun'), unpolarized, ungrounded, is seen on various lower-power devices, from radios to VCRs, some laptop power supplies, game consoles.
    • rated at 2.5A
    • polarized C7 won't fit into unpolarized C8, which is rarely a problem(verify)
    • unpolarised C7 connectors can be inserted into polarized C8 sockets, but this can sometimes be a bad idea
    • A little larger than C1/C2



  • C1/C2, commonly seen on shavers.
    • Rated at 0.2A
    • Looks like C7/C8 but without the dents that make it figure-8


Variants with higher temperature rating include:

very similar shape to C13/C14, but notched so that only the higher temperature cables are accepted
rated for higher temperatures (120°C)
e.g. used for electric kettles
rated for higher temperatures (155°C)
notched like C15 and blockier on the other side, to be more selective (C15 devices will accept C15A cables as well, but not the other way around)


Less common

C10 socket
(pairs with C9)
C9 plug
(pairs with C10)
  • C9/C10, unpolarized, ungrounded
    • rated at 6A




See also:



Vehicle chargers

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.
Type 1 (SAE J1772), Tesla proprietary, Type 2 (Mennekes).
Not depicted: either CCS plug


Interestingly, those boxes on the wall that we call chargers (and are actually called 'electric vehicle supply equipment', EVSE) are typically little more than

  • some safety interlocks - they don't switch on power until they're pretty sure there's a car on the other side
  • communicate how much power this box can safely pass through - because most cars can draw more than smaller EVSEs and/or home circuits can deliver

...and almost nothing more. It's the car that does the actual charge management, decides how much to draw, does any any necessary rectification of AC, and voltage conversion.


...that is, as long as we're talking about the AC chargers - which is all that Type 1 and Type 2 can do. AC charging was meant to be simple and convenient, because it amounts to just plugging it into the wall -- if often on a separate circuit.



IEC Type 1, SAE J1772

IEC 62196 Type 1, a.k.a. SAE J1772, J plug, Yazaki

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAE_J1772

IEC Type 2, a.k.a. Mennekes

IEC 62196 Type 2, a.k.a. Type 2, Mennekes


Used e.g. in Europe, can carry 1-phase AC, 3-phase AC, or DC.

(And this makes little sense in the US because 3-phase power is rare in domestic settings. You see the plug, but it will )

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_2_connector

IEC Type 3, a.k.a. Scame

Refers to two distinct variants.

Briefly used, mostly in France and Italy, but replaced by Type 2 (and Type 1)

Combined Charging System (CCS)
This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

For context: Type 1 and type 2 as mentioned above are AC charging, which means that charger on your wall can be nothing more than just feeding through your regular wallplug power with little more than a few contactors for safety (the actual conversion is done in the car).


DC charging involves more complexity and a more expensive box on your wall -- but can be faster, so we added that later.

Since Type 1 and Type 2 plugs already existed, we just added separate DC lines, to both, for easier backward compatibility.


"CCS Combo 1" a.k.a. CCS1

adds DC to Type 1
US, mostly


"CCS Combo 2" a.k.a Combo 2, CCS2,

adds DC to Type 2
Europe - the EU has basically mandated CCS combo 2.


Notes:

  • each area uses 'CCS' to refer to their variant of it.
  • Because the plug (Type 1, Type 2) relates to how the power grid is set up (the EU has three-phase power in most places, the US rarely does that on residences), that is the part that means CCS1 and CCS2 are as incompatible as the Type 1 and Type 2 they are based off..
Tesla

Tesla has a plug that used to be very proprietary.

It allows both AC charging and DC charging, and over the same pins, so can be a smaller plug, at the cost of the car and charger being a little more complex and expensive.


This is in part Tesla doing their own thing -- but to be fair, but the plug was planned when the others (particulary CCS) barely existed.

NACS

{{zzz|For context The EU had previously mandated a universal thing (Type2, or Type2 Combo2 (verify)), so everything sold in the EU used that (incuding Tesla).

The US had less standardization, so on top of their Type 1, there was also the completely different Tesla plug, and occasionally different ones, so also more variation in capabilities behind these plugs.


They called for a #North American Charging Standard.

While that Tesla plug and protocol was previously proprietary (which was why their charging stations were unusable by anyone else), the standard is now but opened.


The plug is physically the same as it was on Teslas, but it does more things now, and as a side effect became more compatible with CCS, so in theory things will become more compatible, though in practice there are still exception cases. (Remember how universal-but-not-really-and-it's-hard-to-explain-why USB charging is? And how USB-C promised to make that easy but that's not quite what happened? Ideally that won't still happen here.)


See also:

CHAdeMO

DC charging, Japan


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHAdeMO

GB/T

GB/T 20234.3


DC charging, China


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GB/T_charging_standard

ChaoJi

Proposed DC-only standard to replace CHAdeMO and GB/T

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChaoJi

Avcon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avcon

Mains power - wire-to-wire connectors



Screw terminals

Screw terminals (with some spade and loop lugs on the bottom one)

Screw terminal blocks, terminal strips and others names are used interchangably, making some ambiguous with others. (e.g. screw terminal block might refer to what this page calls PCB mount screw terminals)


Not all types are rated for mains voltages, though the ones with separators often are(verify)


Often refer to a screw-and-nut through a flat strip - which are not always the easiest to use on braided wire, and you may prefer to attach forked spade lugs (or loop lugs)

Forked variant of a spade lug (cf. spade connector)


Luster terminals

Luster terminals

Luster terminals, a.k.a. lustre terminals, which seems to come from the german Lüsterklemmen, seem to be mostly used around Europe.

Luster terminals's actual contacts look something like this (varies, not always this solid)


Originally porcelain and of larger and simpler design (a screw clamping two wires together), and often intended to be heat isolation as well so you could use it in enclosed walls and such.

These days often plastic encased, and much more specifically rated connecting piece.


The typical sizes of these are rated for 10A or 15A, but there are a bunch more, down to 3A and up to maybe 100A or so, but both extremes are less common.


ceramic screw terminal

You still sometimes see a ceramic version of the newer design, but only for specific uses, e.g. in saunas.


There are a few local names, like kroonsteen (Dutch), suikertje (Flanders).




Spade connectors

Spade connectors

Spade connectors are a solid bit of metal, and the female part a good amount of area clamping down so these tend to connect very sturdily. (Some also have a clip to make it harder to slide unintentionally)


Various sizes may be rated something between 3 and 24A (order of magnitude).


The female type is frequently shrouded, for isolation.


You see spade connector bars to connect various circuits together in this style.


Related are the eye and fork variants, which are easier to screw down.



Push-in connectors

Push-in style connectors will often push a pushing into a flat contact that is also a spring construction, that tends to dig in a little

Tend to not let you pull out solid core without a bunch of force and/or twisting, which is a feature in that it retains the wire.

You can often find these rated for something on the order of 24A.


Lever locks

3-terminal WAGO 222

Lever locks clamp a spring down on a wire (varied designs, various of which are smarter than a basic basic pressure plate).


There are a few models and brands, but WAGO's is probably best known (note they make other things as well).


Many are made for wires of sizes like 22AWG to 12AWG, and rated for at least 20A (usually listed on them), e.g:

WAGO 222 are spring-clamping connectors rated for 400V/32A
WAGO 221 is a smaller variant of the WAGO 222, rated at a very similar 450V/32A (and 600V/20A)



Wire nuts

Wire nuts



"quick wire connector"

"gel filled crimp connector"

Cheap 2-wire and 3-wire gel filled connectors




wire-tap / splice connectors

T-tap splices

T-tap splices only splice one wire, and connect the new wire via a spade connector



butt connectors

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

Butt splices, or butt connectors, come in a few variants


  • solder seal butt connectors
A variant of the previous but the central ring is soldering tin instead of glue.
Needs more heat (a paint stripper is recommended), but is a better connection.


  • crimp butt connectors
Seem to be fairly solid in the hard-to-crimp-down sense
so probably only usable with the correct crimping tool - I have bad experience without.
may or may not have a separator in the middle, to ensure equal amounts of both wires are inserted


There seem to be more variants of the idea


On circuit currents and connector safety


Computer

Power supply

AMP/Molex power and Berg power connectors

AMP Mate-n-Lok / Molex 8981, plug (top) and socket (bottom)
This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

tl;dr: In the context of computers, calling something a Molex connector typically points to AMP Mate-n-Lok, which was used for most drives for three decades.


Like other plugs, this is a connector named for a company - Molex is a large company that makes many types of plugs.


Except this one has a more confusing history than that. As far as I can tell right now:

AMP Mate-n-Lok (left), Early Molex (right) that isn't any of these
There was a Molex connector (early 60s?) that resembles (but isn't compatible with) the plug we later knew in PCs (the right one on the image with blue background).
AMP in 1963 introduced Mate-n-Lok. Its use in PCs picked up later, maybe late seventies(verify).
...and became common enough in PCs that 1983, Molex developed Molex 8981 which was fully compatible with AMP Mate-n-Lok. (Well, the 4-position Mate-n-Lok -- Mate-n-Lok is actually a larger family[23] though I'm not sure it was back then(verify)).
As such, the thing we called Molex around computers for the next couple of decades (seen on larger floppy drives, on PATA HDD and CD/DVD drive connections of the time) in a practical sense is either AMP Mate-n-Lok or Molex 8981 (the difference mainly in sourcing, as they look the same).
And it was introduced by AMP, so calling it AMP Mate-n-Lok is slightly more accurate in that it doesn't ignore the decade of use that established the connector, calling Molex is much better understood, and practically there is no difference.
The argument is less relevant now that in most computer uses it has been displaced by SATA power plugs.
(also, AMP is now called TE, but the connectors are still called AMP for findability)



A Berg plug, AMP 171822-4

The Berg plug (apparently named after its designer) was mainly used on 3.5 inch floppy drives.

While sometimes called 4-pin mini-Molex, this one is also an AMP plug, specifically AMP 171822-4 for the cable socket, AMP 171826-4 for the right Angle PCB header.

These plugs are becoming as rare as floppy drives themselves.


See also:


PCIe power, EPS power, etc.

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

These connectors seem to come from the Molex Mini-Fit family - most resembling a Mini-Fit Jr though actually seems to use a different keying(verify)


8-pin PCIe and 6-pin PCIe sockets on a GPU (note the left three columns are the same)

PCIe 6-pin (mostly seen on GPUs)

officially: two pairs of +12V-and-Gnd (the last pair is specced as NC)
unofficially often three pairs of +12V and Gnd (most such cables and PSUs allow real current draw on the third)


PCIe 8-pin - an expansion of the 6-pin (mostly seen on GPUs)

Three pairs of +12V and Gnd
with the pin that the 6-pin variant listed as NC now guaranteed to be a +12V(verify)
A plug may separate the 6+2, to be compatible with both 6-pin and 8-pin variants
the extra 2 add a Gnd and Sense

...and there are more footnotes than that.


(The 'PCIe' naming seems to come from the fact that video card power draw is high enough that it is not sensible to get it through mainboard traces / the PCIe bus, so we decided to get it through a plug like this instead.(verify) - it's more of a 'supplementing PCIe video cards' plug, and little else.)

(There seems to now also be a 12-Pin and 16-pin variants on this idea, for some nVidia RTX 3xxx and later series, apparently for space reasons, because it's barely larger than an 8-pin but can carry more power.)




4-pin ATX 12V plug

4-pin ATX 12V (mostly seen on motherboards)

Two pairs of +12V and Gnd
used for power more directly to the CPU, has been around since roughly the pentium 4


8-pin ATX 12V

Doesn't exist and, assuming you said it because motherboard, will probably mean you're looking at 8-pin EPS12V (verify)


8-pin EPS12V socket on a motherboard

EPS 12V [24] (mostly seen on server motherboards)

Mostly seen on server boards (and some higher-power consumer boards), meant for more current to the CPU.
It is not ATX standard - but is effectively a derivative of it, defined by SSI
The 8-pin EPS connector is four pairs of +12V and Gnd
physically incompatible with PCIe 8-pin
the 4-pin EPS connector is two pairs of +12V and Gnd(verify)
this plug seems less common than the 8-pin(verify) (probably because 4-pin ATX 12V will do)


File:4+4 EPS-ATX.jpg

4+4 EPS/ATX (on power supplies, plug only)

Refers to plug only: splittable, so that a PSU needs fewer wires and plastic to accomodate both 4-pin ATX and 8-pin EPS motherboards sockets
That split cheats a little, but it is hard to plug incorrectly unless you get particularly creative with adapters or hammers.
In practice, a lot of consumer power supplies just give you both a 4-pin ATX and 8-pin EPS12V, which is less confusing



See also:

Fan connector

3-pin fan plug in 4-pin (intel-style) connector
This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

PC fans are often connected with a three-pin connector (polarized variant from the Molex KK family) which supplies 12V, ground, and a sensor wire that the computer can use to count revolutions.

There were a few not-so-standard variation, such as Dell's.


You now commonly see Intel's variation, with a fourth pin to the side.

3-pin:

  • 1 - Ground (black)
  • 2 - 12V (often red)
  • 3 - speed sense (often yellow)

4-pin adds

  • 4 - PWM signal - seems to be a voltage signal(verify) so if used at all, it will be used by a transistor in the fan(verify)


6-pin (seen in servers) add:

  • 5 - fan presence (lets the computer do a simpler test to see there is one connected)
  • 6 - fan fault led (for visual feedback which one is broken, useful in datacenters because of cramped hardware layouts and loud environment)


As the larger sockets are physically an extension on the simper ones, this is often fairly compatible -- as long as you know which one is pin 1, which bits of keying plastic usually help with.


"Can I put a 3-pin fan on a 4-pin socket?"

Yes.

That controller is most likely putting an PWM signal on the fourth pin, meaning 12V in the first three is just solid 12V - so the fan is likely to run at full speed.

You could actually make a 3-pin fan into a 4-pin fan with a little soldering (and a 4-pin connector, transistor, suitable resistor. ...but since 4-pin fans basically cost the same, this is generally not worth doing.


"Can I put a 4-pin fan on a 3-pin socket?"

Usually, because many 4-pin fans are designed to work fine on a 3-pin header.

If they were not, they will probably not function at all - so if it spins up at all, it's probably fine.



Lower speeds, in general

If there is no PWM involved anywhere, you could undervolt a fan with a ghetto-ish fix: splice a fan between the +12V and +5V (e.g. from a molex plug) giving 7V.

However, not all fans reliably spin up at voltages like 7V (even if they will continue to run at 7V if already spinning), so check that it does, always, or you'll sometimes have very little cooling.

This is is also why using an inline potentiometer for speed control is less predictable than PWM.


Using PWM is the preferred method of speed control over lowering voltage e.g. with a potentiometer, because PWM will typically work down to lower speeds than undervolting (for an combination of reasons that is a little complex and varies per actual fan).


Motherboards officially just put 12V on the power pin. In the 3-pin-fan days some motherboards would PWM the 12V power pin, which works even on 3-pin fans, but has some footnotes - the 4-pin way is a more standard and somewhat more reliable way of doing PWM.


You can buy little speed control boxes that you plug between motherboard and fan. Which are often but not always PWM based.



Storage

SCSI

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

SCSI is now mostly understood as parallel SCSI (because the newer SAS is 'Serial Attached SCSI'; SAS and also SATA are effectively SCSI derivatives).

This comes from a time where companies sold their own lines, so while some connectors are more common, there are a bunch of peculiarities.

Amphenol/Centronics 50, a.k.a. CN50
DB-25
DD-50
Micro D50, a.k.a. HD50
Micro D68, a.k.a. HD68
VHDCI (68-pin)
SCA-2 (80-pin) on a drive


IDE, EIDE, PATA

You can reasonably distinguish PATA from similar 40-pin plugs from that one filled hole. The plastic alignment notch is also fairly common)

IDE (Integrated Drive Electronics) a hardware bus primarily a ssociated with ATA and its protocol.

IDE can however also refer to some pre-ATA and other not-ATA things.


Once ATA was standard, IDE and ATA were used more or less interchangeably.

Once SATA existed, a distinction between SATA and IDE(-as-in-parallel) became convenient, so both IDE and ATA became a bit vague, and we started using SATA and the retronym PATA (Parallel ATA) became a clearer way to refer to this 40-pin connector.


Notes:

  • If there are two devices on a single PATA cable, one is called master and the other the slave (jumpered that way, or sometimes implied via its position on the cable)
These names are not official. They also do not refer to interaction between the drives at all - both drives operate independently, using their own controllers and both only talking to the host. It was just a way for the host to distinguish between two on the same cable.
  • There was also EIDE, Enhanced IDE, referring more vaguely to early adoption of some features of a then-future ATA standards. The term was also abused by marketing at that time

ATAPI

'ATA with Packet Interface Extension' is actually about protocol, not plug - it can be carried over PATA or SATA.

ATAPI is an extension based on SCSI protocol features, that made it more useful for certain (additional) drive types, such as CD, DVD, and tape drives.


In this context, ARMD ('ATAPI Removable Media Device') is practically use mainly used to refer to ATAPI drives other than CD/DVD drives. Often meaning tape drives.

Early CD drives: Panasonic, Sony, and Mitsumi

Before ATAPI caught on as the standard for CD drives (and having multiple ATA controllers was a given on motherboards), these three companies created proprietary interfaces (sometimes called AT-BUS and other things) to connect CD drives of their own styles.

the relevant end of a Sound Blaster 16 card

Certain expansion cards, e.g. the Sound Blaster 16, exposed these connectors as a simple way to connect these pre-ATAPI drives without needing to buy a specific separate interface card. (TODO: look up the details)


Panasonic and Mitsumi used 40-pin IDC/ribbon connectors (that were potentially confusable with PATA connectors, particularly once PATA (speaking ATAPI) later became the standard for CD drives as well).

Sony used a 34-pin IDC/ribbon connector.


These three use similar signalling (sony removes some unused pins, and squeezes together some ground pins), and all three can be vaguely seen as a sort of a subset of ATA. The linux driver code is interesting reference here - they chose to present it under a similar interface, but at the same time, the low-level differences can't be described very quickly[25].




Side note on ATA

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

ATA is short for "Advanced Technology Attachment", effectively a set of standards that now encompasses Parallel ATA, ATAPI, Serial ATA (SATA), and more.


ATA versions and introduced features: [26]

  • pre-ATA standards had varied limits, particularly in the DOS era
  • ATA-1 (1994) - PIO 1 and 2, 28-bit LBA for sizes up to 137GB
  • ATA-2 (1996) - PIO 3 and 4, DMA 1 and 2 (the terms 'EIDE' and 'Fast-ATA' appeard around this time)
  • ATA-3 (1997) - SMART, connector for 2.5" drives
  • ATA-4 (1998) - UDMA 0, 1, 2 ('UDMA 33')
  • ATA-5 (2000) - UDMA 3, 4 ('UDMA/66')
  • ATA-6 (2002) - UDMA 5 ('UDMA/100'), 48-bit LBA for sizes up to 144 PB
  • ATA-7 (2005) - UDMA 6 ('UDMA/133'), SATA 1.0 ('SATA/150')
  • ATA-8 (2008?(verify); there is a working draft you can get. Includes SATA 2.x and SATA 3.x?(verify) but those make more sense to get directly, SSD TRIM(verify), and some details)

Since then, almost all development is in SATA, which is its own standard.


SATA has its own versioning: [27]

  • SATA 1.0
  • SATA 2.0 (2004)
    • SATA 2.5 (2005)
    • SATA 2.6 (2007)
  • SATA 3.0 (2009)
    • SATA 3.1 (2011)
    • SATA 3.2 (2013)
    • SATA 3.3 (2016)
    • SATA 3.4 (2018)
    • SATA 3.5 (2020)

SATA

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

SATA: Serial ATA, is part of ATA-6 and later. Has basically replaced PATA.

There are variants, but most of us care about the 7-pin data cable (and the 15-pin power cable).


The data socket can be as minimal as just the plastic to hold the contacts, but most sockets are a variation with a plastic shroud (see first image), making it harder to break. This will also accept the clip present on some cables.


Basic SATA's basic power connector has so many pins for scalability reasons - it provides three voltages (3.3V, 5V, 12V), with three pins each to be able to meet requirements of power hungry drives (while not exceepding 1.5A per wire), plus one signalling cable.

This cabling is often not necessary, and there are slimline and micro versions of the power connector, which use simpler wiring, and are good enough for the drives they're meant for.






eSATA plug

For external use there is eSATA, which is pin-compatible and functionally identical. The main differences lie in electronic, cable length, and physical specs, and the connector and socket are different enough so that you can't plug SATA cables meant for internal use onto external ports. (There are dumb adapters, but you should be aware of what you're defeating, and will also have trouble around SATA ports that disable themselves at boot if there's no drive on there)



eSATAp socket, accepting eSATA and Type-A USB plugs. There are also combinations that accept USB3

There is also eSATAp (often marked eSATA+), which is a connector that adds power, and the ability to plug in USB into this same socket. Keep in mind that this may be either USB2 or USB3 (you can usually tell by the color).

eSATAp is a variant of eSATA that carries also carries power -- and also USB.


Only SATA's 5V line is guaranteed on this plug, the 12V line is optional. Desktop computers typically provide 12V, while laptops often don't(verify).

This means eSATAp sockets can typically power 2.5" drives (which only need +5V), but only the desktop variants can power external 3.5" drives (which also need 12V).

eSATApd unofficially refers to having both voltages.


See also:



SAS

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

SAS and SATA have overlap and in many areas broadly compatible.

This is by design.

You could see

  • SAS (Serial Attached SCSI) as the fancier variant of SATA that targets the business market, adding more options and features, more practical variations in controllers, cables with more channels to attach more drives (and have cable failover), options to connect externally as well (e.g. drive bays), and other such options.
  • SATA as the simpler, one-drive-at-a-time consumer variant
that is simpler to use and cheaper to make
(well, with footnotes. There were things like SATA port multipliers but controller support varied)


The protocol is also very similar, though SATA's required commands are a subset of SAS's(verify)), both are switched, point-to-point, serial, full-duplex, can be assued to be good for approx. 300MByte/sec per port (current typical; both have variations and plans), and can be hot-plugged (electrically, anyway. Your BIOS and OS may have their ideas about enabling and resetting ports).


SFF-8482 plug. Drive bays may have similar mounted on PCBs
Back of a SAS drive, SFF-8482 style.
Pin-compatible with SATA, but the plastic tab in the middle prevents mating SATA as-is
Drive-wise

The SAS drive interface is SFF-8482.

It looks a lot like SATA, and can indeed connect SATA as well as SAS drives.

The SAS and SATA drive connections are closely related, and in fact pin-compatible. You can physically plug SATA drives onto SAS controllers, the SAS drive connector (SFF-8482) allows it, and SAS can tunnel SATA. This means server backplanes are easily designed to take SAS and SATA alongside each other.

SATA cannot tunnel SAS, and for this reason you cannot use SATA cabling on a SAS drive. Physically because of the extra plastic, but even if you find a physical adapter (they exist, though I'm not 100% on why), it probably won't work(verify).



Beyond single drives

Because of varied use cases, there are a whole bunch of internal connectors standardized by SAS, e.g. to carry a handful of channels between drive bay backplane and controller.

Many of them are used more in servers, but some of them are obvious choices in handful-of-drives consumer RAID hardware as well.

See e.g. [28]


See also:





mSATA

mSATA (left) and M.2 (right) with M notching

Uses the more general PCI Express Mini Card ('mPCIe') connector as a small drive connector (data+power). ...which caused some confusion, because some sockets were mPCIe, and some mSATA-only (verify) (similar confusion exists around M.2 keyings, actually)

in laptops, mSATA has mostly been displaced by M.2. (due to M.2 NVMe sticks becoming more common, M.2 in desktops is becoming more common, where mSATA rarely appeared)

See also:

M.2

A form factor spec for expansion cards in general, standardized around 2013 (then known as NGFF (Next Generation Form Factor), before it was renamed to M.2)

Can carry include NVMe, SATA 3, USB 3, and (multiple lanes of) PCIe 3.


Consumers mainly see this used for storage, in which case you can consider it a replacement of PCI Express Mini Card connector (and its use for mSATA). Note that M.2 storage can communicate either via SATA or NVMe.

If your PC doesn't have M.2 on-board, there are PCIe plug-in cards with M.2 sockets. If your laptop doesn't, you probably can't use it.

Also keep in mind that it's new enough that not all current systems can boot off M.2 - in which case you can't (easily) use it for your system drive. So you want to check that, because in this aspect there is no upgrade path other than upgrading at least half your computer's hardware.


Widths include 12mm, 16mm, 22mm (typical for storage) and 30 mm.

Lengths include 16, 26, 30, 38, 42, 60, 80 and 110 mm

The size shorthand is those two appended, e.g. 2280 for 22mm by 80mm

There a longer shorthand with more dashes, like WWLL-HH-K-K or WWLL-HH-K, encodes more details (like single/double-sided, maximum thickness of components, and more)


The notchings (specific gaps in the socket/connectors) seem intended to indicate when plugging in a thing almost certainly won't work. If you can plug it in, it should not damage anything, but it is also not guarantee to function.

This also makes notchings loosely correlated with function.


For example:

B and M are wider use (including PCIe lanes), in practice frequently SSD (speaking SATA and/or NVMe)
B has one side has short piece with 6 pins
M has one side has short piece with 5 pins
BM has both of those notches
For WiFi you'll see A and E (verify)

There are about a dozen specific notch combinations, but half of them are currently reserved.


For more practical reasons, notchings are also somewhat correlated to sizes, e.g.

A and E are rarely longer than 30,
while B and M may use up to the full length, and rarely as short as 30.


See also:


M.2's relation to NVMe

NVMe is storage over PCIe communication.


It is mostly relevant to connecting SSD drives

but technically, NVMe platter exists (mostly for pluggability in datacenters, not performance)

For storage, NVMe could be considered an

For storage, NVMe could be considered an alternative protocol to SATA

no but. NVMe can be faster, but for a lot of tasks this is easily overstated


This has led to some misconceptions

M.2 and NVMe are often seen as roughly the same thing, and used as near-synonyms by some.
but M.2 is general, NVMe is storage only
M.2 means storage
M.2 carries other things - PCIe, USB3, and others
M.2 storage means NVMe
but M.2 can carry SATA, or NVMe or both, and which ones a device speaks is up to that device - there is M.2 that speaks just SATA, not NVMe, though not a lot


When M.2 carries NVMe, it allows higher bandwidth (which even most SSDs don't need yet), and also has queues that makes it easier to use the parallelism of fancier SSD designs (e.g. allowing parallel reads), which makes it potentially faster and lower latency than SATA SSD.

How much faster is frequently overstated, at least for most current devices, and most current uses. It's much more a "potentially better", and headroom to be a good interface for a good number of years, much less a guaranteed to be better right now.

More to the point, even if it would for best-case benchmarks, in practice it depends a lot more on the actual workload than the marketing graphs would like you to realize (which is the point of these graphs, of course) because those were made on very specific workloads.

Rather than five times faster everything, you may find increase on most everyday use is more like a few percent to a few dozen percent. Cases that may see a little more may include some servers, some video editing, some games see a modest difference (in loading time, and then only to the degree it is not bound by something else).

So whether the price/performance is worth it depends the same way.

That said, NVMe is at least slightly preferable for SSD, so is likely the preferred interface for SSD in the future(verify).


See also:

Apple's SSD connectors

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.


Apple 6+12 pin SSD connector

Apple has used various different connectors over time.

None of them are M.2 - which is half fair because half of them predate M.2, and half just because Apple doesn't like standards that it doesn't write.

They include:

  • 'first generation', a 6+12 pin (around 2010) (carries mSATA III(verify))
  • 'second generation', a 7+17 pin (around 2012) (carries mSATA III(verify))
  • 'third generation', a 12+16 pin (around 2014) (carries PCIe (verify))
with a later variation that uses a 40 pin mezzanine adapter (verify)
  • 'fourth generation', (~2015) same connector, but higher speed (verify)
  • 'fifth generation', (~2016) same connector, but higher speed and speaks NVMe (verify)


There are often physical adapters from M.2 (the protocols these things speak don't seem to differ), letting you use more generic SSDs, but you must do the research both on protocol compatibility, and whether it will physically fit.


https://beetstech.com/blog/apple-proprietary-ssd-ultimate-guide-to-specs-and-upgrades

USB

First years's most common set:
mini-B plug,   B plug,   A socket,   A plug
Note that mini-A and micro-AB were not common to see
This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.


What we mainly dealt with for a long time

  • USB A: The socket-and-plug almost invariably seen on the computer side of cables, and on both sides of and USB hubs (and sometimes elsewhere, e.g. on printers for direct camera connection)
...until USB-C made C-to-C cables became a thing decades later, particularly on laptops, but even now A lives on
  • USB B: Used on the device side for bulkier devices, such as scanners and printers, where there are no space limitations
sockets are fairly sturdy, compared to mini and micro
  • USB mini-B: Used by not-overly-small devices, such as cameras, MP3 players, some early/chunky phones
sockets may be a little sturdier than micro-B in practice.
approximately 3mm by 7mm
  • USB micro-B plugs and sockets, meant for use in thinner devices
was the go-to for smartphone data/charge cables, there now being displaced by USB-C
approximately 2mm by 7mm


What should make the rest of this list simpler

USB-C plug
  • USB-C (released ~2014)
plug is invertible (and C-to-C cables reversible), so intends to finally make life a little easier (but the amount of footnotes is already moderate)
note that USB does not necessarily varry USB3, even if they were developed in parallel


The part of this list that really isn't simper

  • USB mini-AB socket (socket only), relatively rare, can accept both Mini-A and Mini-B plugs.
  • USB micro-AB socket (socket only) that can accept both Micro-A and Micro-B. Defined by USB On The Go (OTG) (2001 standard)
  • USB micro-A plugs and sockets, meant for use in thinner devices
  • USB mini-A: was never seen that much, perhaps because it is confusable with mini-B.
  • There are many non-standard plugs -- most from the USB2ish era -- that are relatively rare.
Say, I've seen cameras use approximately-8-pin sockets with different cables that connect either USB, or things like audio+video.
such plugs are sometimes confusingly called things like "B-type"
USB3 micro-B plug
  • USB3 A: Plug adds the extra lines for USB3, but remains the same size, and backwards compatible: socket can take earlier (USB1, USB2) USB A.
  • USB3 B: Plug adds the extra lines for USB3, and is bigger. Socket can often take earlier USB B.(verify)
  • USB3 micro-B - basically USB2 alongside USB3(verify), separated with a notch. Seen e.g. on 2.5" external hard drives, USB3 hubs.
  • USB3 Micro-A (looks like USB3 micro-B but squarer) exists only as a plug, and seems rare
  • USB3 Micro-AB (looks like USB3 micro-B but squarer) refers to a socket that takes USB3 Micro-A and USB3 Micro-B, also seems fairly rare
  • USB3 Mini-B - adds pins to the original mini-B. Came much later than the original mini-B and seems to be a cost saver over USB-C that may not be standard?(verify) Seems rare?(verify)


USB A (e.g. for PC) and micro OTG (e.g. for phone) in the same plug

And then there's some creativity.


Notes:

Blue often means a USB3 port
Yellow or red in sockets are often intended for charging, supporting higher-current capacity and/or ports that will charge things even if the host computer is powered off.
Green and purple indicate specific fast charging - green for Qualcomm Quick Charge (QC), purple for Huawei SuperCharge


Keep in mind that most 'old plug plus a new bit'-style USB3 plugs will carry USB2 through them - in fact entirely separately from the USB3 pins.

USB-C also basically still carries USB-2 separately.

(USB-4 made things even more complex, but we can ignore that for now.)


See also USB notes


See also:



8P8C / Ethernet cable

Ethernet cable (8P8C plug, with colors indicating TIA/EIA-568-B wiring)

For the series of connectors, see #Modular_connector_.28and_Registered_Jack.29.3B_.3FP.3FC

For the use of 8P8C in ethernet, see 8P8C / RJ45


Firewire (IEEE 1394)

The 6-lead plug
The larger 6-lead connector and smaller 4-lead connector
both Firewire-400
The 9-pin Firewire-800 plug, 'beta'
which can also be used for S1600 and S3200
IEEE1394c allows Firewire at 800MBit over 8P8C/Cat5 cabling
This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.


IEEE 1394 is better known as FireWire (Apple), and sometimes i.LINK (Sony), and Lynx (Texas Instruments).

It was meant as a successor to parallel SCSI, and is also commonly used for some digital cameras, and for high-end audio and video devices. Was a potential competitor to USB in many areas, but while USB is somewhat slower (depending on which variant of FireWire and USB), USB is more popular for many things.


Connectors include:

  • 4-lead
    • smaller, e.g. used on more portable devices like cameras. Data-compatible with the 6-lead connector, but doesn't provide power. Initially developed by Sony, later more widely adopted(verify)
    • two twisted pairs of data
  • 6-lead ('alpha')
    • two twisted pairs of data, power
  • 9-lead ('beta')
    • two twisted pairs of data, power, shield (verify)
  • 8P8C connector (used in 1394c)


Standards:

  • IEEE 1394, specifically IEEE 1394-1995
  • IEEE 1394a, specifically IEEE 1394a-2000, also known as FireWire 400
    • Uses the 4-lead and 6-lead ('alpha') connectors
  • IEEE 1394b, specifically IEEE 1394b-2002, also known as FireWire 800 (Apple's name)
    • adds the 9-lead ('beta') connector
  • IEEE 1394c, specifically IEEE 1394c-2006, also known as FireWire S800T
    • adds the 8P8C connector


See also:



Thunderbolt

Thunderbolt socket

Intel and Apple developed Thunderbolt.

(Developed by Intel under the name Light Peak, since renamed)


Uses the same plug as Mini DisplayPort (well, the first version does).

Which is intentionally backwards compatible.

But, for the same reason, also potentially confusing,

It's a more generic bus like USB, but the expectations of such are probably still mostly monitor-y.
so e.g. the same Apple monitor might do more on one laptop than another.

It's safe to connect and will display, but any feature beyond that won't work.

You can tell by the logo:

monitor-like logo → Mini DP
lightning bolt logo → Thunderbolt.


Note that Thunderbolt 3 uses the standardized USB-C (which is now entering general use), so mini-DP-style thunderbolt is now sometimes referred to as Thunderbolt 2 connector.

This at least is expected to be a generic interconnect.



Thunderbolt 1 reuses the Mini DisplayPort connector; thunderbolt capability is indicated by a lightning symbol.

Can carry DisplayPort, one or more PCI Express lanes, and up to 10W of power.
Copper cables carry two 10GBbps (1.2GByte/s) lanes, of which any device can use only one (seems a fair-sharing thing)
Assume ~3 meter max over copper(verify)
Can daisy-chain a few devices (though individual devices have to have the plugs for it, and allow it)(verify).

Thunderbolt 2

Much like 1. Largest difference seems to be that a device can use both channels(verify)


Thunderbolt 3 uses USB-C connectors. Plugs and sockets should bear the thunderbolt logo to lessen confusion.

Speaks more protocols (DisplayPort, PCIe, USB 3, ...)
Allows adapters to the previous MiniDP plug
Not guaranteed to carry 10W as before (though USB could choose to do more than that) (verify)
Assume it can do 20Gbps as before. Short or active cables could do 40Gbps(verify)



On Thunderbolt 3, USB3, and USB-C

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

USB-C is a physical connector more than anything else, in that it is intentionally protocol-agnostic, and there are already a handful of protocols that can be negotiated on top, including

USB3 (3.1 for 5 or 10GBps, USB3.2 for 20GBps)
USB2 (often Hi-speed, 0.48GBps)
USB Power Delivery (a simple protocol to negotiate transferring more power)
Thunderbolt 3 (10GBps, 20GBps, 40GBps(verify))
video (DisplayPort, HDMI, MHL)
...or some combination.


It is context-dependent which protocols the endpoints care to speak.

Which is both nice and potentially confusing.

Yes, it reduces the amount of cables and connectors you need and makes USB more universal.
But also, there will be various cases of "doesn't work" that will not be easy to explain.

Say, Thunderbolt 3 chose USB-C plugs/cable (previous versions used mini-DisplayPort), so TB3 can in many contexts be seen as an extension of USB3. But a Thunderbolt3 device will do nothing on a USB3-only host. Probably.


USB-C cables are created roughly equally.

...well, that was the plan, anyway. Sure, most combinations will function, but there are footnotes that mostly technicians and gearheads will care for - except when not.

In practice,

USB-A to USB-C might be USB2 or USB3, depending on the USB-A plug
(it also can't populate all lanes, because USB2 didn't have thay)
USB-C-to-USB-C should populate everything
apparently even these exist in USB2- only variation, but this should be rare
but yeah, even C-to-C cables exist in half a dozen variants already (see the specs[30])
USB-C-to-USB-C do not all support the same speed
basics are roughly 480mbps, 5gbps, 10gpbs(verify)
but some variants may be capable of sustaining 20Gbit, 40Gbit(verify)
may mean some protocols, or some features within a protocol, may not work(verify)
USB-C-to-USB-C do not all support faster charging
and if they pretend to do so, but are out-of-spec knockoff cables, this is somewhat riskier these days, because there is a bunch more current involved than in earlier USB


PS/2

PS/2 plugs, on USB-mouse-to-PS/2 adapter and USB-keyboard-to-PS/2 adapters, respectively
This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

The name PS/2 comes from the IBM PS/2, a 1987 PC that was part of setting some standards in that market (e.g. 16550 UART, 3.5-inch floppy disk, the VGA graphics standard, and the PS/2 port.


These days, PS/2 most often seems to refer to the PS/2 port, which was a 6-pin mini-DIN connector used primarily for keyboard and mice, initially replacing

  • the 5-pin DIN connector used for keyboards in PC/AT
  • 9-pin D-sub (DE-9) serial connector for mice

PS/2 port lived on on motherboards, even when USB keyboards and mice became the norm.


Because the mini-DIN connector has seen other uses, it is sometimes confused.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PS/2_port




Uses the 6-pin mini-DIN connector. For keyboards, this replaced the larger DIN plug used on AT style computers before PS/2. For mice, this became an alternative to serial port mice, though USB is now also quite common for keyboards and mice.


D-sub (D-subminiature)

The sizes (widths) of various D-sub plugs
DE-15 (also seen named HD-15, DB15, HDDB15), used for VGA monitor connections
Back of a computer with DB-25F (parallel port), DE-15F (VGA connector), DE-9M (serial port).
The DA-15M held next to it is a MIDI-on-a-gameport cable
This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

D-subminiature have a keystone-shaped shell for seating and earthing, and typically fastened with screws.

Most have two rows of pins, some three.

Spacing of pins within a row is 2.76mm, rows are 2.84mm apart.

the 'high density' (HD) variants have 2.3mm pin spacing, 2.0mm row spacing

Coding:

  • The second letter indicates the shell size (A through E),
  • followed by the number of pins present,
  • and sometimes the M or F for male/female (originally P and S for plug and socket)

Given the shell size and pin spacing, there is a typical amount of pins for each size of shell when there are 2 rows: 15 for A, 25 for B, 37 for C, 50 for D, 9 for E.

There are however exceptions, like the three-row variants (e.g. DA-26, DD-50, DE-15), and sometimes other things in there (e.g. DB13W3).


Some common examples:

  • DE-9:
    • often a serial port (RS232) interface
  • DB-25
    • Parallel ports
    • Serial ports - though they were unnecessarily large, so quickly adapted to replaced with DE-9
    • sometimes (older) SCSI (verify)
  • DE-15:
    • VGA monitor connectors. (Uses three rows of pins. Also technically called HD-15, where HD stands for the High Density of the pins compared to other D-Sub plugs)
  • DA-15:
    • game port (mostly seen on older PC sound cards), originally for joysticks, later also used for MIDI
    • in earlier networking, the AUI connector was the way to connect distinct physical layers to a unified interface (analogous to the later MII), that with adapters could go to 10Base2, 10Base5, 10BaseT, and more


Some people abuse specific letter codes thinking that anything just refers to the D-sub plugs in general, and started patterns of misleading use for those that do know what they mean, e.g. DB15 to refer to DE15 (VGA) or DA15 (gameport).


There are smaller variants called Micro-D and Nano-D, mostly seen in military and space use.



Micro D-sub

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

Smaller and denser variants of the D-shell and pins idea.

(also called mini, but this is arguably extra confusing, in that (regular) D-sub is short for 'D-subminiature') (is this sometimes called half-pitch D-sub?(verify))

Smaller pitches (at least 1.27mm/.050"), and may have pins aligned grid-like rather than in a triangle, though there are probably various distinct series that fit this vague description.

I'm not sure what series these are officially part of - sites now tend to categorize them under SCSI connectors, or computing miscellany.


Ones I've come across:

Micro D50
  • Micro D50
1.27mm (.050") pitch
aligned between rows
Micro D68 (with a less-usual plastic shell)
  • Micro D68, which you may recognize as 'something to do with SCSI'
1.27mm (.050") pitch
aligned between rows
  • Micro D25
1.27mm (.050") pitch
triangle alignment between rows(verify)


Adapters exist to e.g. Micro ribbon for SCSI

Ribbon-cable-and-IDC

34-pin floppy cable plug on the left, a 40-pin parallel ATA plug on the right (the latter recognizable by the one filled hole, and the plastic alignment notch is also fairly common)

{{comment|(

💤 Technically, this term is very vague, since
  • ribbon cable is just the lots-of-wires-side-by-side part, which itself does not imply any connector
  • IDC just says the connector stabs through a cable to connect to it

Even the combination of the two terms is still somewhat vague - hundreds of combinations would qualify - but specific contexts correlate with specific standards. For example, in computers, it typically means the DIN 41651 series of connectors.


DIN 41651

Its pin headers can be very basic, so this is a cheap yet solid thing to connect something low-pin-count, medium speed, that doesn't need to be changed very often.
The pitch (hole spacing) is often 2.54mm (0.1 inch), though there are variations - for example, parallel ATA connectors for laptop disks often had 2.0mm pitch.
once common for more devices, though now it's getting displaced (heh) by more specific standards for specific uses


Some that remain:

  • Some motherboard-connected ports not directly on motherboard, e.g.
    • an extra serial port, audio connectors (varying pin details)
    • extra USB2 ports (varying pin details), and more
  • used internally in a lot of places
but may be entirely specific to a case, and less standard than various of the above.


Once common, no longer:

  • 40-pin (2x20, 2.54mm pitch - 3.5" hard drive connectors (parallel ATA),
Mostly a 40 pin IDC connector wired straight through, but with pin 20 blocked
80-conductor cables still only use the same pins, but put a grounded wire between each to reduce crosstalk
detectable as such because pin 34(verify) is grounded at the host side of the cable, instead of being wired into the cable (pin 34 which was reserved, and unused since early days(verify))
(note that such details make IDE cables not the best choice to reuse as non-IDE interconnecting)


  • 34-pin (2x17), 2.54mm pitch - floppy connectors (controller side, and drive side for 3.5" floppy drives)
also old Sony CDROM drives, see above
  • 44-pin (2x22), 2.0mm pitch - 2.5" notebook hard drive connectors (parallel ATA)



See also:

Micro ribbon connector

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

Micro ribbon connector or miniature ribbon connector and some other names


The shell's shape is much like that in D-sub (and see also the potentially confusable name in micro-D-Sub), but in micro ribbon connectors, the actual connectors are strips instead of pins. I think I've found connector counts like 14, 20, 26, 36, 50, and 68(verify), but it seems there are a few specific selections for specific uses. Many are now rarely seen.


There are actually two sizes of this connector,

  • the larger, more common one with a 2.16mm / 0.085" pitch
  • the smaller with a 1.27 mm / 0.050" pitch - and this smaller variant doesn't seem to have a very official separate name. I've seen it referred to as mini-Centronics, miniature delta ribbon (MDR), mini D ribbon.


The 'micro ribbon connector' name now seems somewhat odd

  • it's not micro, it's not even small
  • the larger one is/was more common and basically called micro, and then there's a mini version.
So mini(-micro) is smaller than micro, great
  • ribbon is easily understood as ribbon cable e.g. seen on IDC connectors, or perhaps flat flex cable, neither of which are commonly used on this connector (does ribbon actually refer to the style of contact?(verify))


Female 50-pin micro ribbon connector, here used to connect SCSI-1

Example uses:

  • IEEE 1284 is parallel port style communication
defines use of
the 36-pin larger variant (sometimes MDR36, sometimes HPCN36 'HPCentronics'). This use is known as the Centronics connector because that company basically introduced the use for printers, typically with DB-25 on the other side. Use in printers was displaced by USB.
(people will easily call other micro ribbon connectors Centronics because of this association).
(IEEE 1284 also defines the 25-pin D-sub often used on the other side, and the the 36-pin mini variant - see e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mini-Centronics_36_pin_with_Micro-Centronics_36_pin.jpg )
  • SCSI
I have yet to do a deep dive into the history of SCSI connectors, please do your own.
but it seems to use at least the 50-pin connector in earlier days
there were some vendors that used the mini-Centronics connector
(SCSI it also used IDC headers, and what looks like a micro D-Sub, 50 and 68-pin variants, and some others)
mini MDR26 on a CameraLink cable
mini MDR26 socket (CameraLink), alongside a DA-15 for size reference
standardish, but used mostly in somewhat older professional kit, so hard to get in shops
  • TODO: verify whether Japan's D-Terminal is using mini-MDR14


See also:



Internal bus

Mobile devices

Phone (landline)

Modular connector (?P?C); Registered Jack

8P8C plug, 6P6C plug, 6P4C plug, 4P4C plug, 6P6C socket

Modular connector (when it refers to a specific connector) were developed for phone uses, though have also found uses as e.g. board-to-board connectors when space is not cramped.


Variations of socket and plug are named by

  • how many positions there could fill (which also implies the plug/socket width), and
  • how many conductors are actually present (typically filled out from the center positions)


For example, 6P2C has 6 positions and two conductors, 8P8C has 8 positions and has conductors in all positions.

The 4, 6, 8 positions/lead connectors are mostly standard, 10P10C and further variations also exist.


See also:


RJ meaning analog phone

Registered Jack refers to a handful of analog telephone pinouts / wiring standards, most of them on these modular connectors (RJ that uses other plugs includes the RJ21 centronics style connector, and some adapters).

The ones familiar to consumers are mostly 4P on phone handsets, 6P for analog phone lines, and 8P for networking.


Once you get into the details and specific plugs, there is only loose association between specific connectors and likely uses.

This can be useful to know when you want to use these for other things, in that you may have more luck finding these plugs and sockets by the associated RJ uses.

Consider for example

  • 4P4C ~ RJ22 - mostly used to connect handsets to phones (two pairs, one for the microphone and one for the speaker)
also RJ9, RJ10 but people seem to mix these quite vaguely so you can consider RJ9, RJ10, RJ22 as synonyms until you're doing the wiring
4P2C exists, but is not used much
  • 6P2C ~ RJ11 (one-pair, one telephone line)
(You also see 6P4C sold as RJ11 though this is technically incorrect)
  • 6P4C ~ RJ14 (two-pair, two telephone lines)
  • 6P6C ~ RJ25 and RJ12 (three-pair, three telephone lines)
  • 8P8C ~ RJ45, RJ48 (ethernet, multi-line telephone, ISDN, T1 / DDS)


Notes:

  • There are often two plugs for the same use, which seems to be because of the type of wiring, e.g. the stabs on the pins mean RJ12 is for solid, RJ25 is for stranded(verify).
This is about wire crimping and such, and using the wrong type will typically work, but issues arise sooner rather than later, so in professional setups this is not a detail


See also:


RJ45 meaning ethernet?

Well, no. But that technicality was lost long ago.


When a few variants of wiring Ethernet (e.g. 10Base-T, 100BaseTX) started using the 8P8C plug (this wiring), and became popular, RJ45 shifted to mean "Computers using Ethernet" (and made us abandon and forget things like 10BASE2 and 10BASE5).

...even though

the 8P8C plug is used by other standards as well (and by non-standards)
RJ45 is a phone-wiring pinout
Ethernet is a large set of standards with a multitude of connectors


The association with Ethernet is now strong enough that searching for RJ45 pinout shows you the TIA/EIA-568-B pinout instead, and even some proprietary pinouts, before you get anything mentioning a phone. It's actually hard to do a web search for the original phone wiring, and you'll even get hits titled "Could RJ45 be used for telephone?"


To add to the confusion, 8P8C was for a time seen connecting networking and phones -- because a single analog phone line (middle pins) and 100MBit ethernet (which avoided the middle pins) could coexist on the same plug, which some offices used to reduce the amount of wiring and sockets to install. (Today, the same offices would use VOIP phones and only care about networking)


See also:



Less standard ?P?C uses

Many. It's a fairly convenient connector that clicks in and won't fall out, cheap, and the wires are easy enough to get.


Landline wallplug

Dutch phone plug

A lot of countries have switched to RJ11 within the house (and sometimes RJ45), often away from something more local.


Countries that still haven't fully shed themselves of older plugs (often just in older houses) include...

  • Britain - BS 6312 [33]
Loosely resembles F-010 (flat things on the side)
Loosely resembles TAE
Loosely resembles TAE (flat things on the side)
  • Australia - 600-series [37]
  • Netherlands - seems to just be known as phone plug, not sure whether it has a known name
  • Brazil - Telebrás (named for a company)
  • North America - Bell Systems 404A and 505A (60s), changed to RJ since the 70s
  • South Africa - Protea (70s to 90s)
  • Sweden, iceland - SS 455 15 50[38]


Also, some countries had a distinct plug used only for ISDN (which now barely exists) or ADSL (now often also RJ)

Memory cards

See also

SD and MMC

Sizes and basic pins
(not showing extra UHS pins)

Physical size: There's mainly

  • SD (24x32x2.1mm) (MMC was apparerently a little thinner?)
  • microSD (11x15x1.0mm)
previously called TransFlash (abbreviated TF and T-Flash), and some parts of the world still prefer that name
  • (There's also MiniSD, which never really took off)


The variants are pin-compatible (some footnotes on the faster ones with extra pins), so adapters to larger sizes exist, and the choice of which you want relates more to the device. For example, cameras and laptops and generic card readers often prefer SD, which is a little sturdier and less fiddly to move around, smartphones use microSD because of the smaller size and it being more or less permanently in there anyway.


Capacity types / families

  • SD (now named SDSC, 'standard capacity', to distinguish it); since approx 2000
    • size (somewhat artificially) limited to 1-4GB (and most were tens of megabytes large at the time)
  • SDHC (high capacity), since approx 2006
    • physically identical but conforming to a new standard that allows for higher capacity and speed.
    • adressing limited to 32GB
  • SDXC (eXtended-Capacity), since approx 2009
    • successor to SDHC that allows for higher capacity and speed
    • adressing limited to 2TB
    • UHS was introduced since roughly then.
      • this "UHS to go faster" is optional, and is still not all that common
  • Ultra-Capacity (SDUC), since approx 2018
    • limited to 128TB
  • SDIO
    • allows more arbitrary communication, basically a way to plug in specific accessories on supporting hosts - not really an arbitrarily usable bus for consumers
    • (supports devices like GPS, wired and wireless networking)


These acronyms are not so simple. Practically this may be partly about function, partly about capacity.

It's also not entirely aligned with SD versions, protocolwise it's even more interesting, particularly with the extra buses for the faster (UHS and Express) modes.

I think most people have lost track of the details by now.


We have also passed the point where the newest generation of SD are not not guaranteed to work in the oldest readers (usually still do, though).


MMC's relation to SD

In today's context, MultiMediaCard (MMC) (since roughly 1997) was the predecessor for SD cards (since 1999).

SD has been more common than physical MMC card for a long while now but variants of MMC (some of them specialized or local) have come out until recently, and there is less difference than 'predecessor' might suggest.

Also, because SD builds on MMC both physically and in terms of protocol, many SD controllers will still accept MMC cards.

Like SD, MMC had some size variants (see e.g. MMCplus, MMCmicro).

There is more MMC-based variation, in part because it was an open standard so let companies roll their own.


Worth mentioning is eMMC, basically a flash chip meant for internal use, that happens to be built on MMC. It was in common use for internal storage in phones and tables until it was displaced by UFS.

External/larger SD readers for a long while also had sockets for MMC cards, because MMC was the previous generation of roughly the same thing, and it was a a nice extra feature to put on the box even when MMC cards are becoming rare.

this is now rare, also in part because SD is now more usually integrated


SD speed

Bus speed is the maximum the wiring can deliver data at. Classically there's

  • Standard
12MB/s max
  • 'High-speed' - clocks SDSC and SDHC at double the rate
25MB/s max
  • UHS-I
Introduced in version 3.01 (~2010, basically around when SDXC was introduced)
for SDHC and SDXC
one LDVS pair on the same row, bus speed specced at ~100MB/s max
  • UHS-II
Introduced in version 4.0 (~2011)
for SDHC and SDXC?
an extra row of eight pins: two extra LDVS pairs, and more power and ground)
bus speed specced at ~300MB/s max
  • UHS-III is only part of SDUC(verify)
introduced in version 6.0
bus speed specced at ~600MB/s max
Also introduced "Video Speed Class" rating
Express, which are primarily about extra speed --
  • SD Express (introduced in version 7.0)
bus speed specced at ~900MB/s max

Notes:

  • I'm still confused about how SD Express and UHS-III relate
  • Remember that UHS require hardware support from the reader go at these speeds (or will go to the basic speed).
  • external readers connected via USB2 will often go no faster than 25MB/s (for both USB and cheaper-controller reasons),

so there is little point for them to support UHS.

  • none of this says anything about the an actual SD card - they vary


Card speed marking

This tells us it's a UHS-I card, it's video class 10, UHS class 1, and speed class 10

Marking-wise

  • Speed class - looks like a circle with a number in it - one of 2, 4, 6, or 10
(and a class 0, which doesn't specify performance so is meaningless)
that figure is which is MB/s
apparently this was intended as a minimum sustained write speed, but practice proves not everyone keeps to this, so if specs look optimistic, they probably are. It seems to vary with honesty, so a good Class 6 card may well perform better than a bad Class 10 one.
there is no larger-than-10, no matter how much fast it actually is
those details (and the fact that these days most SD can sustain 10MB/s) means this class system is no longer informative
  • UHS speed class - looks like a U with a number in it (1, 2, or 3)
1 is 10MB/s
3 is 30MB/s
...so UHS speed class has very little to do with UHS version
and since these seem to be the only two classes, this is almost as pointless as the classic up-to-10 speed class
  • Video speed class - V with a number, V6, V10, V30, V60, or V 90.
again, it's just MB/s
These were introduced because recording not-too-compressed HD video tends to want [40]
perhaps 10MByte/s for SD, 720p
perhaps 30MByte/s for 1080p
perhaps 60MByte/s for 4k
perhaps 90MByte/s for 8k
These are apparently required to be sustained-average speeds(verify)
  • Packaging may try to stunt with speed, but beware of the words "up to" (possibly in tiny print)
For example, I have a card that says writes up to 80MB/s and reads up to 170MB/s, yet all the logos on it suggest it can't guarantee sustaining more than 30MB/s. Curious...
so assume this is marketing bullshit in general


For video, you probably want 10MB/s for standard definition, 30MB/s for 1080p, 60MB/s for 4K, and 90MB/s for 8K


Actual performance

Speed ratings can still... sort of lie.

There are two gotchas to speed ratings:

  • due to the nature of flash, read is a lot more predictable, and often faster, than write
how much faster/slower depends, but it's easily a factor 2
whenever marketers can get away with it, they will specify the read speed
note that the differences vary, due to differences in controlles. E.g. external card readers tend to be cheap shit, though there are some examples of slow
  • writes can be faster in short bursts
because you're actually talking to a storage controller, managing the flash (or the operating system buffers)
You usually care about sustained average write instead
And sometimes about the guaranteed speed, i.e. the minimum per second-or-so



Latency

Read latency is often in the 1ms to 2ms range (with no hard correlation to speed class).

Write latency is not constant, because you're actually talking to a storage controller that typically buffers your data, and is managing flash blocks.

Each card may act differently, and there is no direct relation to speed class.

Writing ~1K blocks

you can assume at least 30ms as a longer-term average
usually many smaller, and one much longer one every so often
on a shorter term can take anywhere from 15ms to 200ms
or more, but variants of the specs say ~200, 250ms, 500ms max(verify)
with some outliers around 4ms and 700ms

The same cards will tend to do better average latency for larger write sizes, up to some amount.


As such, things like fast continuous sensor logging will have to be able to buffer ~0.5 second of sampling, and sample parallel to the writing.


See also:


See also:

SD at lower level

Electrically

Power is 3.3V, though there are some lower-voltage details - in particular the LVDS being lower voltage (1.8V(verify)).

(MMC had 7 pins)

SD has 9 pins before up until UHS-II

SD with UHS-II adds 8 pins for a total of 17 pins

two more LVDS pairs, and more power and ground


MicroSD has 8 pins

MicroSD with UHS-II has 17 pins


SD formatting

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

SD cards are often partitioned(verify), typically MBR style, though are also seen partitionless using the entire block device for a filesystem.

However, Windows has not always understood having more than one partition(verify), but in recent times seems to deal fine with the mix of partitions that e.g. RPi often uses.


SD card partition(s) classically came formatted as FAT32 {{(and small ones occasionally FAT16 or FAT12 (verify))}}.

While FAT32 could be made to access 2TByte, historical code made assumptions that means above 32GByte people tend to use other things just to be safe -- in this context typically exFAT. (so many tools will default to partition to a single FAT32 partition, at least up to 32GByte)


SD protocol and DIY notes

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

Since there are a a few card types and more transfer modes over the years, supporting all the possible things a card can do is quite involved.

Asume you will not be using the faster modes, without some up-front planning, or at all.


You're talking to the flash controller, and it should support a handful of protocol variations, that are basically negotiated from the most basic one. Any fancy device will want to do that for speed, but for DIY that basic choice (SPI) is much simpler. (note there are some recent cards where SPI mode is optional, though(verify))


In SPI mode the pins are mostly just SPI's MOSI, MISO, SCLK, select, and ground, and Vcc.

Code-wise, you'll still want to find a library. If you don't, you'll probably end up writing much of one anyway.


Even detecting what kind of card is there is interesting.

You'ld think this is part of negotiation, but for historical reasons it's more of a "does it completely fail to respond to this kind of initialization? Then it's probably an this older type".

See e.g. https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/77417/what-is-the-correct-command-sequence-for-microsd-card-initialization-in-spi


CompactFlash (CF)

Type 1 Compact Flash (CF)
This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

Basically a PATA bus, and talking ATA, directly on the side of a memory card.


Often contained flash (which was initially fairly small), though initially also for very small hard drives (microdrives).

It offered good features early on (compared e.g. to SmartMedia), but was later displaced by smaller and faster formats - though the sturdiness let it hold on in certain uses, e.g. photography where huge storage size is less important.


Physical size: 36m high, 43mm wide

Type I is 3.3mm thick
type II is 5mm thick

Type II was mostly used by microdrives, also because II is allowed to draw more current than I. As microdrives were fairly quickly displaced by flash-based storage, most CF cards are Type I, and not all devices do not fit Type II cards(verify).

There are derivations, like CFast (SATA bus) and CFexpress (PCIe bus) but these are essentially different formats.


Initially, storage size was dozens to hundreds of MByts, because when it was designed (mid-nineties) a GByte was more storage than a lot of PCs had. In the 2000s they grew to dozens of GBytes. (Recent CF5.0 allows much larger, though in a lot of uses a hundred GByte or so is more than you need, and larger may be better served by a more modern, faster format)


Because it's really just ATA, maximum transfer speed varies with ATA version. Original specs used PIO modes, at 25MB/s, later UDMA modes supported up to 166MB/s.

(and some CF even actually is that fast, which is still on par with modern SD cards).
yet most regular cards didn't go above 20MB/s or 30MByte/s, and maybe single digits from cheap ones (note: also like cheap SD today).
Template:(it's also relevant that readout was often done over USB2, which has a similar limit)
The x speed rating is multiples of 150KB/s (like in CDs), so e.g.
133x is approx 20 MB/s
1066x is approx 160MB/s.
Note that the listed speed is usually the read speed, not the write speed.

See also:

Memory Stick (Duo, Pro, Micro (M2), etc.)

Physical sizes: 'standard', Duo, and Micro/M2
This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

The three sizes are electronically largely identical, and adapters from M2 to Duo-size and standard-size exist.

Seen on mobile phones, cameras, The PlayStation Portable, etc. Competed mainly with SD and CF at the time.


Maximum space:

original: 128MB
PRO: 32GB (probably the most common)
XC: 2TB


There are three physical sizes (which you could call Standard, Duo, and Micro):

  • that of the Memory Stick Standard, PRO (longer and thicker than the Duo)
  • that of the Memory Stick Duo, PRO Duo, PRO-HG Duo (shorter and thinner than the standard)
  • that of the Memory Stick Micro (M2)

If you haven't seen some or all of these before:

the Standard and Duo's angled corners make them somewhat confusable with SD.
The size of the micro (M2) makes it somewhat confusable with the microSD.

See also:


xD

xD card

A few types, sizes up to 512MB and 2GB varying with them.

Apparently quite similar to SmartMedia


https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=xD+card&title=Special:MediaSearch&go=Go&type=image

SmartMedia (SM)

Smartmedia
  • quite thin (0.76mm), feels fragile for its other dimensions
  • capacity limited to 128MB (...so not seen much anymore)

See also:


RF/coax connectors

Plugs desiged (mostly in terms of shielding and impedance) to carry radio frequencies, associated with carrying video, data, and more.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RF_connector

Belling-Lee (IEC 169-2)

Both ends of a Belling-Lee extender cable

Used for in-your-house TV and radio connectors in some European countries, and Australia.

Diameter is around 9.5mm.


Some people seem to call this a PAL connector, which is apparently mostly an association with the countries this is mostly seen in.

Some call it a coax plug, which is even vaguer.


Note that on houses with more serious installations, it's not unusual to see these only in the eventual wall-plug and the cable that goes to the TV, while everything up to that point might se F connectors or such - in part because the Belling-Lee plugs are not ideal for VHF and UHF frequencies (but fine for MW and Shortwave) and there are some losses every time you connect them(verify) so you really don't want them more than once in your chain if you can help it.

See also:


F Connector (IEC 169-24)

F Connector

Diameter: ~14.5mm

Often used for cable television / cable modems, satellite television, and (American) TV aerial connections.

A little less lossy for VHF and UHF than Belling-Lee is, so is seen in more places in infrastructure(verify).


See also:



'UHF connector'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UHF_connector


BNC

BNC, Bayonet Neill-Concelman (apparently also sometimes Baby Neill-Concelman connector, Baby N connector, British naval connector(verify), bayonet nut connector) was once common for networking (e.g. 10BASE2, others).

Still used for some antennae, video (then often composite video), oscilloscopes, occasionally audio and other things, for the ability to carry higher bandwidth analog signals, the shielding, or both.


The plug is designed for a particular characteristic impedance, often 50 or 75 Ohm, and while there are two different plugs, they have only slightly different dimensions and doesn't require a lot of force to mate them, and while they often look different there is no simple definitive way to tell which is which.

This makes little difference under order of 10MHz, but high bandwidth applications will care about mismatches.

The dimensions vary a little between these two, but order of magnitude, the barrel is roughly 10mm and the plug's outer dimensions roughly 15mm



See also:


TNC

TNC connector

TNC, Threaded Neill-Concelman, is a variation on BNC with a screw thread system (BNC uses bayonet).


R-TNC (Reverse TNC) connector for the antennae on a WiFi access point (note that the smaller R-SMA is also common there)

Reverse TNC is reverse in that the inward/outward threading is switched between male and female plugs. This is seen e.g. in older/larger WiFi antennas, an area where the smaller R-SMA is also regularly seen for the smaller ones(verify).


See also:


C connector

C connector (left), beside a BNC connector (right) for an impression of size
This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.


The Type C Connector looks like BNC, but is bigger.

(BNC was developed as a smaller version of this [41])


See also:



Some smaller RF connectors

SMA (male)
SMA (female)

SMA is short for for SubMiniature version A (There are also SMB and SMC connectors)

Rated to 12 GHz or sometimes more.

Diameter: ~6mm for the thread/female, ~8mm for the male/outside


A variation called RP-SMA ('reverse polarity') is seen used in WiFi antenna connectors (the larger R-TNC also sees use there, mostly on older APs).



SMB jack

SMB is similar in purpose to SMA (though only rated up to 4 GHz), but

smaller (~4mm for the thread/female)
snap-on rather than threaded.


SSMB is a smaller variant (2.7mm?(verify))



SSMB, MCX, MCX, SMA

MCX is similar to SMB (also snap-on rather than threaded, rated to 6 GHz), but smaller (3.05mm?)

MMCX is an even smaller variant (2.5mm)


See also:





U.FL / MHF / I-PEX / IPAX / IPX / AMC / UMCC

Some size reference
This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.
Close-up; U.FL connector on the left (top right of the PCB), and plug held in the calipers on the right.


These various names all refer to tiny (2.0mm) connectors for high-frequency RF signals (up to approx 6GHz), and seem mostly interchangeable(verify). Seen in various mobile and wireless applications.

There are adapters to things like (RP-)SMA sold for applications such as WiFi, mobile modules (particularly machine-to-machine hardware), and others.


See also:


Unsorted RF connectors

CRC-9 (3mm)

TS-9 (3mm)

MC-Card (2mm)

Power - industrial and multiphase interconnects

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_and_multiphase_power_plugs_and_sockets


IEC 60309 (Europe)

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.


See also:

Lighting sockets

Edison screw

Edison screw (E27, E14)

Typical for lightbulb/pear shapes.

The number is the outer diameter of the metal screw part in millimeters.


There's quite a few of them, but by far most common are:

  • E26/E27 - common large screw variant
Apparently there's a correlation where E26 is for 120V countries and E27 for 230V countries(verify),
they're physically close enough to often fit (verify)
  • The more common small variant is usually E14 (Europe) and E17 (US) (verify)


There are a handful of other diameters in use, e.g.

E11 (Europe), E12 (US) 'candelabra'
E10 (miniature) in older flashlights, indicator lights, older bike lights
uncommon now in all those uses, because e.g. LED is more efficient than incandescent
E39/E40 (giant/'mogul') in industrial / older stage lighting


There are also a whole bunch of adapters, because within the same country it's the same voltage, and you might want a different style of lamp, deal with specific or chandeliers, etc.


See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edison_screw#Fittings

bi-post / bi-pin

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

Many bi-post are IEC 7004 (verify)

You may like overviews from image searches for terms like light bulb socket types diagram


The number specifies the pin distance. Each distance tends to have a unique socket/plug design, in part to make them more easily identifiable.


GU10 (on a 230V MR16 bulb), GX5.3 (on a 12V MR16 bulb)
G9 with its loops

Variants with smaller distances are typically small spots (classically halogen), for example:

  • GU10 - pins, 10mm distance, widened bayonet-style end (seems to be one of only a few G variants that has that bayonet)
  • GX5.3 - pins, 5.33mm distance
  • G4 - pins (4mm distance, thinner)
  • G9 - flat loops, 9mm between the centers of the loops

These may be easy to find in supermarkets and such - though the exact set varies a little with where you live.



Larger variants like

  • G23 and G24 are used in office lighting.
  • G53 is used e.g. in larger PAR spots


On relations to the bulbs


A few further details/associations are specified by the letters, e.g. G, GU, GX, GY, GZ.

For example, GZ bulbs use dichroic glass, which means the glass conducts and dissipates heat, so lets out much of the heat at the back.

Power and beam angle may wel be specified [42] though have some inconsistencies in specification.


While endless combinations between socket, bulb, and voltage could exist, there is a lot of consistency in what is actually produced at all - what type of bulb, reflector, and voltage is used on each connector

...so in practice most most further details are (only) implied from most specific references being unique(verify).


For example:

  • GU4 are often 12V MR11 bulb
  • GU5.3 are often a 12V MR16 bulb
  • GU10 are often mains-voltage MR16 (as are various others with >7mm pin spacing)
GZ10 is like GU10 but does not have a beveled base, which means you can't use GZ10 in GU10 sockets (but can the other way around). The reason seems to be a heat/safety restriction: GU reduces heat to to the rear/socket, GZ does not.
  • G6.35 (1mm thick pins)
  • GY6.35 (1.25mm thick pins)
  • GY6.35, G8, or G9 are more frequently JCD type.
G9 is often mains, G6.35 is often low-voltage

But don't count on this, because there are exceptions



Shapes and reflectors

JC, JCD

Refers to a shape - just the small halogen bulbs, no reflector. Can be 12V, 24V, or mains voltage.

Comes in a few base sockets, often one of G6.35, G4, G8(verify)

Apparenly frequently semi-permeable glass, which is why you shouldn't touch it with your oily fingers.


MR, Multifaceted Reflectors
MR16 (GU10), MR16 (GU5.3) MR11 (GU4)

MR (e.g. in MR11, MR16) refers to a Multifaceted Reflector, which produces a more focused beam than simple parabolic reflectors. (see also PAR, which is more specifically an anodized reflector)

MR bulbs are mostly associated with G-style bases, including GU10, GX5.3, and G4.


The number in MRsomething is the bulb diameter - in eighths of an inch, so MR16 bulbs are 5.1cm in diameter, MR11 are 3.5cm.

The combinations of diameter and socket aren't unique - which means it's fairly easy to walk into a store and buy a MR16 and discover you needed one with a GU10 and GU5.3 base and got the other.


You sometimes see specifications of diameter as well as power and beam angle - see [43].



On voltage

Different MR bulbs may be 12V (most) or higher voltage (some), so never blindly assume.


12V may still be AC, though are often DC in practice.(verify) LED-based MR-series often won't care since they need to rectify anyway.

Some of the 12V (switch-mode) adapters designed for a string of halogen MRs will not like the low power draw of LED variants. You need a transformer that is not trying to be clever, one designed for lower draw, attach more lights on a single adapter, or get one designed with LEDs in mind.



Other notes

See also DIY_optics_notes#Stage_lighting.


Low power or signals

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

Sure, there are many things you can abuse the other way, but there are also things that are more designed (or more accidentally quite fit) to carry both low current power, or signals.

Binding posts

Testing things

Banana plugs

Banana plug (4mm) on the black plug on the left (these happen to be stackable, which they only sometimes are).

The thinner (2mm) not-so-banana plug on the right (adapter) that many would consider a multimeter probe
I think I bought the top ones as 'bullet connectors' but they're closer to banana


The banana plug is named for the curvy lengthwise springs that friction-lock the plug.

Shapes vary, and not all such 4mm plugs have a friction-lock design, or the same one if they do.

Length was typically 20mm, though e.g. the US seems to use 15mm, and there's more variation.


They might be rated for something like 30V, 15A -- BUT products vary and some are much flimsier and will not be rated like that.

It seems the main reason for the low voltage is not isolation in the arcing sense, but safety in the sense that the contact is exposed.

Names like "safety banana jacks" would refer to variants with fixed shrouds, or sleeves that retract, and may be rated for higher voltages. These are more frequently seen on e.g. multimeters.


The 4mm version often carries lowish-current power or occasionally audio - it is seen on things like

  • measuring devices, such as multimeters, bench power supplies, and such
these are often also stackable somehow (4mm hole in the back, or side)
and e.g. banana-to-BNC for oscillosocopes (handy for non-HF frequency measurements)
  • amp/speaker connections
easy to replug
capable of dealing with moderate current



There is a 2mm plug seen in similar situations - seemingly mostly multimeters, probably because it's a nice tradeoff in study enough to not break, and thin enough to poke at many smaller components.

It's not really referred to as a (variation of) banana plug, because the lengthwise springs are not there, but I haven't found a better place to group it under.


See also:





Crocodile clips / Alligator clips

There are many variations in look and quality, these are three of them

Crocodile clips are useful for making a temporary electrical connection that will be decent and stay on.


The ones in the image here are a few cm large and don't carry much current. Two of these plug onto banana plugs, for ease of use with multimeters.


There are large ones, seen e.g. around car batteries, that are much beefier.

See also:


IC clips

Test hooks / pincer clips / IC grabbers

Test hooks on some 2.54mm-spaced pins

...and probably other names.

Details vary, but generally these are small grabby springy things that extend and separate when pushed by hand, and pull in and close when you let go.


This should give comfortable temporary connections on pins down to 2mm pitch or so, where alligator clips would already be troublesome due to their thickness.

The image shows a very cheap variant (one extended), but even they still work pretty well.



Pogo pins

Spring loaded conductive connectors.


Mostly used in automated testbeds, where a PCB often needs to be pressed into a handful of these, and in some other places where you want many points of non-permanent contact.



See also:

Push-release terminals

Smaller JST connectors

JST refers to a company that makes many series of plugs.

The below are mostly used as PCB (inter)connectors useful for data signalling, though many are rated for (on the order of) 1, 2, or 3A, so also useful to transfer some power.

A few of the series:

JST RCY

JST RCY,
socket and plug

Pitch: 2.5mm pitch

Pins: 2 (not a series)

keying/mating: round shape that guides into shell

Seen in RC vehicle applications, there known as JST connector, BEC connector(verify), P connector(verify)

Rated for 3A (with AWG22(verify)).

See also:


JST XH series

3, 4, 5, 6, and 7-pin XH sockets on a LiPo balance charger; one 3-pin XH plug

Pitch: 2.5mm

Pins: 2 to 20

Keying/mating: two slits near the side of one long end, with some slight bayonetting (works out more as a friction thing)

Rated for: 3A (with AWG22)

Perhaps most recognized as a connector commonly on lithium batteries (2 or more pins depending on how many cells, for balance charging)


See also:

JST EH series

JST EH

Pitch: 2.5mm pitch

Pins: 2 to 15

Keying/mating: socket one side unshrouded, plug one side wider; slits on short edges

Rated for: 3A (with AWG22)

See also:

JST SM series

JST SM, 2-pin and 6-pin variants

Pitch: 2.5mm

Pins: 2 to 18

Keying/mating: locking clip in the middle (on 2-pin it's the entire width) and keying on middle of one long side, 'wings' on the short sides

Rated for: 3A


"SM2 connectors" seem to refer to the 2-pin variant(verify)


See also:


JST PH series

9-pin male PH-series connector
Plugged 2-pin PH-series connector

Pitch: 2.0mm

Pins: 2 to 16

Keying/mating: plug has two slits on the one side long, socket is open between them (one slit and nothing open on the 2-pin variant)

Rated for: 2A (with AWG24)

See also:


JST ZH series

JST ZH (left), with SH on the right for contrast

Pitch: 1.5mm

Pins: 2 to 13

Keying/mating: two slits on the sides (the shortest ends)

Rated for: 1A (with AWG26)


See also:


JST SH series

JST SH (right), with ZH on the left for contrast

Pitch: 1.0mm

Pins: 2 to 20

Keying/mating: slits on short end(verify)

Rated for: 1A (with AWG28)


See also:



JST VH series

JST VH

Pitch: 3.96mm

keying/mating: slots to the side, clip

Rated for 10A (with AWG16)

See also:


Smaller molex connectors

Molex KK

5-pin Molex KK-254(verify)

Pitch: 2.54mm (the most common that I've seen)

Pins: 2 .. 36


Pitch: 3.96mm

Pins: 2 .. 24


Pitch: 5.08mm

Pins: 2 .. 12

Keying/mating: slits around socket's wall, ridge along wall for friction


See also:


Micro and pico variants

https://www.molex.com/molex/products/group/micro_connectors


  • picoblade
1.25mm pitch
molex picoblade


Smaller AMP connectors

(The company is now TE Connectivity, previously Tyco Electronics, and AMP far before that, but we tend to still call them connectors AMP)


MTA

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.


MTA 100 connector

single row, 0.1" / 2.54mm pitch

MTA 156 connector

single row, 0.156" / 3.96mm pitch

mta-156 OR MTA-100

https://www.te.com/usa-en/products/connectors/pcb-connectors/intersection/mta-100-mta-156-connectors.html?tab=pgp-story



Circular metric

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

Circular metric and circular industrial don't refer to any one connector or standard, but informally to connectors that are round.

Metric seems to refer to a metric screw barrel, industrial to 'it looks sturdy' and probably to a few specific series of plugs that I'm not aware of yet.


It's a basic idea implemented in different ways by various companies, which is why they exist in snap-in, bayonet, push-pull variants; metal and plastic barrels; various types of internal keying, and more variations.


In my (very biased) recollection I've seen the metal variants more around larger and industrial machines, probably because they're a way to have a sturdy, many-pin, and somewhat isolated control signal interconnection.


Device producers may favour one of them internally, so you probably see some of these more consistently than others.

And some are largely convention. Say, some specific LEMO plugs (among many - like DIN and Molex and other cases, we're naming an entire company[44]) are seen around cameras -- but with varying pinouts (and of varied types, there's also e.g. LEMO optical and triax both used around video).


Some are even standard.

Say, there's the GX series connectors seen fairly consistently around aviation, usually smaller and fewer pin (I see mention of GX16, GX20, GX12, the number is the barrel diameter in mm)


Down to some cheap plastic (but waterproof) connectors seen around garden/christmas lighting, distinctly keyed (which in a few examples I found correlated with the voltages used).

...and seemingly everything inbetween.

Mounts, chip carriers, packages, board connectors

PCB connectors

('PCB connectors' is probably not the best name, I'll think of another)


Headers

Basic pin headers (male), here on the back of a small PCB

Known variably as pin headers, just headers, as breakaway headers, as and under various other names.

Often 2.54mm (0.1") pitch.

Also the things that jumpers (sometimes known as shunts) sit on.

And you could call a row of headers a Single In-Line package (SIP) without too much of a stretch.


PCB headers are a fuzzy, wider concept, and can refer to pin headers as well as many more specific deivations, then often seen in shrouded and/or keyed (notched) form.

One simpler example is KK-family molex, which mostly add bits of plastic as polarity protection but will fit on basic headers as long as they have the same pitch.



PCB mount screw terminals

Screw terminals in general may be little more than just a screw to fasten down a wire to a metal plate.


The variant for PCBs, with pins underneath you can solder, is usually also decently shrouded with plastic.

Available in varied pitches, though mostly larger, like 2.54mm, 3.5mm, 3.96mm, 5.08mm, (verify)


Combining these with bootlace ferrules tends to look like fairly neat work.


See also:



Ferrules

Ferrules also known under a few other names are sleeves meant to crimp onto stranded wire.

Among them 'bootlace ferrule', which seems to point out that this is halfway between an aglet and a crimp connector.


They are comparable to some variants of crimp pin: They wrap a shell around all strands (so avoid some issues with a single strand whisker making contact you don't want).

They make particular sense around stranded wire, in that

  • there is less risk of one of the barely-visible strand going off to the side and touching something it shouldn't.
  • screw terminals won't damage the strands (so the wires are a little more reusable)

The wider plastic part means they're not great when there are many wires to be connected cramped side by side, but this is not often a real issue - they're still fine in most sizes of screw terminals.


Compare also to butt splices



Euroblock

Euroblock, also known as Phoenix connector, has screw terminals on one side and a snap-in connector on the other.

Can be convenient and fast working on semi-permanent setups, where you frequently want to re-plug things in the same way, and/or plug around comparable items.


It seems mainly used around few-wire control signals (e.g. RS-485), and audio setups (often for balanced audio(verify)).


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euroblock



DIN 41651

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

DIN 41651 (image search) includes various series of fairly common insulation-displacement connectors, including IDC.


Usually two-by-many pins, also seen in four-by-many.

Often 2.54mm (0.1") pitch, smaller variants exist.

Variations:

  • With or without alignment notch (verify)
  • With or without strain relief
  • With or without latches



DIN 41612 / IEC 60603-2

"DIN 41612" OR "IEC+60603-2" (image search) resembles DIN 41651 (IDC and such), but applications are more specialized, and often has more connections (dozens is not unusual, up to over a hundred).

Commonly two-by-many or three-by-many pins.


A few specific ones in the series are used by some pluggable rack systems.

For example, VMEbus is why a lot of image hits will be the 3x32 variant.



Flexible flat cable (FFC)

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

Could refer to any cable that is flat and flexible (and is thinner than ribbon cable), but FFC usually refers to a fairly specific type commonly seen used as pluggable interconnects in tight spaces such as inside laptops and phones.

Seen in various colors - white, transparent brown/orange, gray, black, and others (color can correlate somewhat with size/pitch).

Common pitches include 0.5mm, 1 mm, 1.25mm, 2 mm.


FFC connectors often refer to the PCB sockets that accept the end of these cables (though a few designs opt for specific connectors that take less space).


See also:


Related are Flexible Printed Circuits (FPC), which are circuits built fairly directly onto these cables (often using small SMD components, and often fairly simple circuits) - image search


(Card) Edge Connectors

back of a 5.25" floppy drive with a card edge connector, notched to match the connector on the bottom


Refers to connections where one side is part of the PCB itself, with traces going to the edge in regular spacing, meant to plug into a spring connector socket,

That socket is often either fixed on a PCB (consider RAM, PCIx and similar), or sometimes in the middle of a cable (consider 5.25" floppy drive connectors)


Consider e.g.

  • 5.25" floppy drives (two-sided, 34-pin)
  • DRAM modules (rather smaller pitch than the above)
  • various game cartridges, including NES, SNES, Sega, N64, Gameboy, DS, Switch, and more[45]
    • ...with some gray area -- many memory cards do not technically qualify - they look the same as these cartridges, except that the contacts are often not traces on a PCB (presumably often for the good reason of putting less tension on the actual PCB?(verify))

May be one-sidede or two-sided.


See also:

Board-to-Board connectors

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

Broadly refers to anything that does many-channel signaling between distinct circuit boards.

Can refer to

  • setups that directly fit boards together (often fairly specialized, small, pin-dense connectors)
  • things only useful for board connectors, like FFC
  • wire-to-board used to connect boards, like IDC
  • Specific physical layouts, as simple as Arduino shields' specific layout of pin headers

...and more


Mezzanine connectors

Micro Match

Micro match connector

Elastomeric connectors

Elastomeric connectors, a.k.a. ZEBRA strips,


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastomeric_connector

Mounts, chip carriers

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

Packages refer to the specific design and size of something a particular component is housed in.

You will often see specific component types (and particularly specific models) in certain specific packages/mounts. For example, transistors are often seen in SOT or TO, diodes often in DO, LEDs often in what seems to be called T1, and so on.


Surface mount which may seem recent but has been around since the sixties. Surface mount has introduced a lot of specific smaller packages. It's hard to summarize them and give a decent impression of which are more common.


On pitch

Pitch refers to the spacing of pins (more often mentioned in through-hole components, as those are fairly wide-purpose, while suface mount components tend to be more specialized packages)

Common pitches include

  • 2.54mm (0.100")
  • 2mm (0.079")
  • 1.27mm (0.050")
  • 0.8mm (0.031")
  • 0.5mm (0.019")


There are a number of different measures that can be relevant in addition to pitch.

See for example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_electronics_package_dimensions#Through_hole_pin_dimension_reference

SMD/SMT versus though-hole

There is a noticable distinction in through-hole versus surface mount:


SMD (Surface Mount Devices) and SMT (Surface Mount Technology) often means leads that end flat on the circuit board, to be soldered in place (often with reflow soldering, wave soldering, or such).

SMD seems to have become popular since approximately the eighties. There are SMT variants of ICs, resistors, capacitors, and various other sorts of packages.

SMD/SMT can also be seen as the top of a hierarchy of a load of specific packages.

The style it is replacing has been (retroactively) named though-hole, occasionally abbreviated to THT (though-hole technology).


See also:

Packages, roughly from fewer to more leads

TO, SOT, SC, some small SMD

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

TO, SOT, SC, SOD refer to a style of making packages, all with quite a few variants, and usually with a small pin-count (often between 2 and perhaps 7, usually between 3 and 6).

While they have names referring to specific uses and sizes (TO: 'transistor outline', SOT: 'small-outline transistor', SOD: 'small outlide diode'), most of these packages end up seeing many other uses - particularly those packages that handle more than average power (heat).

Note that a number of specific packages have names in more than one of these series.

Many of these are THT, some SMT, some usable as both as they have long pins (some bending involved for THT).




TO ('transistor outline')

TO is often used when there is more-than-negligible current involved (mostly because of the package's thermal capacity), e.g. for transistors, regulators, darlingtons, power resistors.


TO-18
TO-3


Specific TO packages include:

  • TO-220 (images) (good heat dissipation, frequently used where power is involved)



  • TO-236-AA (resembles SOT-23, but sizes are a little different)


D2PAK
  • TO-252(-AA), a.k.a. DPAK (4.6mm pitch)
  • TO-263(-AB), a.k.a. D2PAK (effectively 5.08mm pitch, because the middle isn't a pin(verify))
  • TO-262 a.k.a. I2PAK
  • TO-251 a.k.a. IPAK





File:SOT-23.png
SOT-23 with 3 pins


SOT ('Small Outline Transistor')

A surface-mount package, used for transistors, but also rectifiers, regulators, and more.


There are quite a few variations, many with pins that are wider for better heat transfer.


  • SOT-23 - with different amounts of acually present pins, sometimes referred to as:
    • SOT-23-3
    • SOT-23-5
    • SOT-23-6
    • SOT-23-8
  • SOT-89
  • SOT-223 (three-terminal)
  • SOT-232 (three-terminal)
  • SOT-363
  • SOT-353
  • SOT-416 (SC-75) (three-terminal)
  • SOT-723 (three-terminal)
  • SOT-883 (three-terminal)



SC looks like SOT, but has thinner leads (verify)

  • SC59
    • SC59-5
    • SC59-6
  • SC-74A
  • SC-70





DO

THT-style diodes are often seen in DO-xx, for example

  • DO-35
  • DO-15
  • DO-41



LEDs often in [46]

  • the circular plastic housing is often mentioned just by its radius, though seems to also be called:(verify)
    • T-1 (3mm)
    • T-1 3/4 (5mm)
    • T-3/4 (2mm)

seems to be called T1(verify) (but more commonly mentioned just by its radius)

  • flat housings (THT connectors)
  • SMT



SIP

Pitch: 2.54mm

Single Inline Package. Regularly 0.1" pitch. Hardly a package at all.


DIP

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

Pitch: 2.54mm (most variants)

DIP (also DIL): dual in-line package, usually for ICs which need relatively few pins (up to 64 or so, usually fewer).


DIP often implies 0.1 inch (2.54 mm) pitch.

Most DIP chips have a row spacing of either 0.3 inch (7.62 mm) or 0.6 inch (15.24 mm). DIP is now often assumed to be 0.3" (which is also sometimes called skinny DIP(verify)).


Since DIP is largely about pin spacing, many things besides ICs can use or be compatible with DIP, or make DIP sockets useful for other things than DIP ICs.

For example:




SO

SOIC (Small-Outline Integrated Circuit)
This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.
SOIC-14

Pitch: 1.27mm

Pin count variation:

  • SOIC-8
  • SOIC-14
  • SOIC-16

There are wider variants.

See also:


SOJ
This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

Pitch: 1.27mm (verify)

SOIC with J-type leads (instead of gull-wing leads).


SOP
This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

Pitch: 1.27mm, and also 0.80mm, 0.65mm, 0.5mm, 0.4mm

Followed SOIC(verify)


  • TSOP (Thin Small Outline Package) [47]
pitch: 0.5, 0.55, 0.65, 0.8, 1.27mm
  • SSOP (Shrink Small Outline package) [48]
pitch: 1.27mm (verify)
  • TSSOP (Thin Shrink Small Outline Package) [49]
Pitch: 0.65mm
  • VSOP (Very Small Outline Package) [50]
0.65 mm
  • MSOP (mini SOP)
Pitch: 0.65mm
  • QSOP (Quarter size SOP) [51]
Pitch: 0.625mm (25 mils), usually
  • µSOP (micro SOP)
Pitch: 0.5mm
  • HSOP - SOP with heat wings
  • HSSOP - SSOP with heat wings
  • CSOP

PLCC (Plastic Leaded Chip Carrier)

PLCC44 IC (1.27 mm pitch) in socket
This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.


PLCC chips have J-shaped leads that wrap around the side and under the IC.

the side allows it to be seated in a PLCC socket (can be handy for replacement ability, or when heat is critical),
the fact that they wrap lets them also be soldered to surface-mount pads.

Pitch: 1.27mm


PLCC sockets have slots across one diagonal, for a specific PLCC extractor tool that eases removal.

Was also used in early CPUs, after DIP and before more specialized sockets.


Actually sits in a group called JLCC (J-Leaded Chip Carrier), subdivided into:

  • PLCC (Plastic ~), which seems much more common of the two
  • CLCC (Ceramic ~), which seems used mostly for in some high-temperature and prototypes(verify)


See also:

Flat no-leads package, Micro Leadframe

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.


Chip Scale Package

QFP

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.
QFP44 (0.8mm pitch(verify))


Quad Flat Package is a number of related packages that use gull wing leads (out, down, and out again parallel with the SMD pad it's intended for)


There are a dozen named specifics, which mostly just vary in things like

  • smaller-pitch variants
  • heat sinking
  • material (plastic, ceramic)
  • thickness (some are low profile)

Pitch: 0.80mm, 0.65mm, 0.5mm, 0.4mm, 0.3mm (more?)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quad_flat_package

PGA

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

Pitch: 2.5mm, 1.27mm

Plastic or ceramic (PPGA, CPGA)

BGA

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

Pitch: 1.5mm, 1.27mm, 1.00mm, 0.8mm, 0.5mm

See also


Unsorted chip mounts

Narrow-use but not single-use PCB connectors (mostly around DIY)

Grove connector

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.
Grove sockets on an arduino shield

The grove connector is defined by seeed studio.

It's a 4-pin, 2mm-pitch connector (not a JST or molex plug, apparently NSTech PITCH 1125?)


They're intended to be a specific plug, to make quick prototyping easier.


Pinout seems to be

  • VCC (5V or 3.3V depending on context)
  • Gnd
  • Sig1
  • Sig2

...where those last two may be wired one of

  • digital IO - two adjacent digital pins
  • analog IO - two adjacent analog pins
  • UART - TX, RX
  • I2C - SDA, SCL
  • (no SPI?(verify))


It's not universal in the sense of "if it plugs in it will work", because each grove socket is wired to just one of these four alternatives, so you still have to figure out what the device speaks and what socket you need to use for that.

...with some overlap, e.g. digital pins may overlap with UART or may be PWM capable.

Still, it's quite convenient that you can just plug it in (particularly for demonstrations).


See also:

qwiic

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

4-pin JST-SH (so 1.00mm) to connect

  • 3.3V
  • I2C (IIC)

Notes:

  • daisy-chainable
  • a few hundred mA (and consider cable thickness and length)

See also:

STEMMA and STEMMA QT

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

STEMMA 3-pin

  • JST PH, 2mm, (looks similar to grove)
  • for Analog/Digital/PWM signals

STEMMA 4-pin

  • JST PH, 2mm, (looks similar to grove)
  • for I2C

STEMMA QT (4-pin)

  • JST SH, 1mm, (looks similar to qwiic)
  • for I2C

Compatibility:

  • STEMMA QT is compatbile with qwiic if you observe some voltage details (qwiic is 3.3V only, STEMMA QT can be switched between 5V and 3.3V)(verify)
  • STEMMA 4-pin or STEMMA QT is compatible with grove if you observe voltage details (grove, like STEMMA, can be 3.3V or 5V)(verify)


See also:

Bee series socket

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.
(X)Bee socket, and Mikrobus for comparison

Two two rows of 10pin 2mm pins.

Mostly known for XBee (the Digi brand name for its 802.15.4 products), but there are other things connected with this, like Bluetooth, Wifi, GPS, 868MHz style wireless, LoRa.

The socket is used on some Arduino and related boards (e,g, lilypad, seeduino stalker, dfrobot leonardo, waspmote).

MikroBUS

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.
MikroBUS sockets, one with a 4-20mA R click and one without anything, on an arduino shield

Two 8-pin 2.54mm pitch with specific pins wired to:

5V, 3.3V, Ground
Reset
Analog
PWM
SPI
I2C
UART
pin that supports interrupts (where possible)


mikroBUS is an open-standard socket from mikroElektronika that is meant to allow various sensors to be more plug and play


It does not seem very common beyond Click boards (which seems to be their own brand), but there's a whole bunch of them, so this certainly has its uses.

It can help that, because you can have adapters to arduino, raspberry pi, and some other DIY boards, it works as something as a platform-agnostic pin adapter.



See also:

Unsorted

"IDC"

This article/section is a stub — some half-sorted notes, not necessarily checked, not necessarily correct. Feel free to ignore, or tell me about it.

IDC stands for "insulation displacement connector".


IDC is not a connector.

IDC is not even a family of connectors, though it sometimes gets used as such.


It's arguably about the other end of the actual connector: not the socket-plug part, but the part where either of those meets wires - it is a property of how that connection works:

What 'insulation displacement' means means is "has blades that cut through the insulation (and possibly a bit of the wire too)", and includes things like splice connectors, gel filled crimp connectors, DIN 41651, and a lot more.


As such, you probably do not want to use these on wires that move a whole bunch of amps. This warning goes for a whole bunch of splice connectors, actually.

and yes, people do this anyway. In particular, see tap splices used in cars.

Luckily, "IDC" often means data/signal connectors


See also