Audiophily and audiofoolery notes: Difference between revisions

From Helpful
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
   
   
{{avnotes}}
{{avnotes}}
=Disclaimer=
There are many audiophiles that have preferences ''regardless'' over whether there is truth to it.
I'm not here to frustrate over them.
See [[Brandolini's law]].
And the audiophiles are happy ''regardless'' of reality, because that's how [[confirmation bias]] works. 
I have a little envy there.
'''This is only here to convince myself, not anyone else.'''
I ''do'' care about a halfway decent audio system,
but I try to quantify what is probably the weakest link,
to avoid throwing hundreds of hours and thousands of bucks at the wrong parts.
As far as I can tell,
: there are a handful of things you can get for ''free'' just by knowing them,
: after which ''can'' usefully spend a few hundred bucks before the largest issue becomes your room,
: and ''maybe'' a few thousand before it's your head (positioning and such),
: and then ''in'' your head (believing nonsense marketing, or inventing your own).
Beyond ''that'' point madness lies.
And ''well'' before that, you will find the slippiest technobabble since star trek TOS,
except in utter earnesty, about real-world physics.
So this is ''definitely'' in an opinionated according-to-''me'' page.
Though I do try to do my research.
In my research I found a plethora of poop out there,
so I am biased to be very critical stance by default - and to be fair, sometimes more than merited.
The true stuff will often take longer to get to me,
and some ratings may rise over time as I understand the subtleties
people are not very good at explaining.

Revision as of 19:10, 22 April 2024

The physical and human spects dealing with audio, video, and images

Vision and color perception: objectively describing color · the eyes and the brain · physics, numbers, and (non)linearity · color spaces · references, links, and unsorted stuff

Image: file formats · noise reduction · halftoning, dithering · illuminant correction · Image descriptors · Reverse image search · image feature and contour detection · OCR · Image - unsorted

Video: format notes · encoding notes · On display speed · Screen tearing and vsync


Audio physics and physiology: Sound physics and some human psychoacoustics · Descriptions used for sound and music

Noise stuff: Stray signals and noise · sound-related noise names · electronic non-coupled noise names · electronic coupled noise · ground loop · strategies to avoid coupled noise · Sampling, reproduction, and transmission distortions · (tape) noise reduction


Digital sound and processing: capture, storage, reproduction · on APIs (and latency) · programming and codecs · some glossary · Audio and signal processing - unsorted stuff

Music electronics: device voltage and impedance, audio and otherwise · amps and speakers · basic audio hacks · Simple ADCs and DACs · digital audio · multichannel and surround
On the stage side: microphones · studio and stage notes · Effects · sync


Electronic music:

Electronic music - musical terms
MIDI · Some history, ways of making noises · Gaming synth · microcontroller synth
Modular synth (eurorack, mostly):
sync · power supply · formats (physical, interconnects)
DAW: Ableton notes · MuLab notes · Mainstage notes


Unsorted: Visuals DIY · Signal analysis, modeling, processing (some audio, some more generic) · Music fingerprinting and identification

For more, see Category:Audio, video, images

Disclaimer

There are many audiophiles that have preferences regardless over whether there is truth to it.

I'm not here to frustrate over them.

See Brandolini's law.


And the audiophiles are happy regardless of reality, because that's how confirmation bias works.

I have a little envy there.


This is only here to convince myself, not anyone else.

I do care about a halfway decent audio system, but I try to quantify what is probably the weakest link, to avoid throwing hundreds of hours and thousands of bucks at the wrong parts.


As far as I can tell,

there are a handful of things you can get for free just by knowing them,
after which can usefully spend a few hundred bucks before the largest issue becomes your room,
and maybe a few thousand before it's your head (positioning and such),
and then in your head (believing nonsense marketing, or inventing your own).


Beyond that point madness lies.

And well before that, you will find the slippiest technobabble since star trek TOS, except in utter earnesty, about real-world physics.


So this is definitely in an opinionated according-to-me page. Though I do try to do my research.


In my research I found a plethora of poop out there, so I am biased to be very critical stance by default - and to be fair, sometimes more than merited.

The true stuff will often take longer to get to me, and some ratings may rise over time as I understand the subtleties people are not very good at explaining.