Elision: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{#addbodyclass:tag_ling}} | |||
{{ling}} | |||
Elision (yielding elided forms) refers to [[unmorphologized]] omissions of ''sounds'' from words, often part of a syllable, or an entire syllable, rarely more. | Elision (yielding elided forms) refers to [[unmorphologized]] omissions of ''sounds'' from words, often part of a syllable, or an entire syllable, rarely more. | ||
Elided forms are often simpler to pronounce, but are not formalized in writing. | |||
Elided forms are often simpler to pronounce, but are not formalized in writing - you might e.g. pronounce camera as camra but you would still write camera. | |||
<!--That said, they ''can'' lead to language change.--> | |||
<!--(aluminium versus aluminum has a more complex history [https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/aluminum-vs-aluminium] and is ''not'' a good example)--> | |||
Consider the seemingly unusual writing of Gloucester, and subtler cases like Parliament, etc. | Consider the seemingly unusual writing of Gloucester, and subtler cases like Parliament, etc. |
Latest revision as of 23:28, 21 April 2024
Elision (yielding elided forms) refers to unmorphologized omissions of sounds from words, often part of a syllable, or an entire syllable, rarely more.
Elided forms are often simpler to pronounce, but are not formalized in writing - you might e.g. pronounce camera as camra but you would still write camera.
Consider the seemingly unusual writing of Gloucester, and subtler cases like Parliament, etc.
(You can probably have technical arguments over whether loanwords have adapted or elided.)
Reasons for elision include easier pronunciation after adoption of somewhat unnaturally pronounced words,
easing pronunciation of words before formal adoption,
dialectical variation,
poetic license (e.g. for keeping the meter in poetry),
laziness,
or even just drunken slurring.
Some elided forms become accepted spellings over time, through common use; consider contractions like "can't" for "cannot".
These are often morphologically recognizable tendencies.